Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29609635›Full record

ReviewRetrovirology2018

Why was PERV not transmitted during preclinical and clinical xenotransplantation trials and after inoculation of animals?

Joachim Denner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Retrovirology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetically engineered porcine liver: a new era in transplantation.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Future of xenotransplantation in Korea.Clinical transplantation and research · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Xenotransplantation of solid organs].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  9. Enhancing Kidney Transplantation and the Role of Xenografts: Report of a Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Monitoring for PERV Following Xenotransplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Milestones on the path to clinical pig organ xenotransplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joachim DennerRobert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany. DennerJ@rki.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TRR127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) are present in the genome of all pigs, they infect certain human cells and therefore pose a special risk for xenotransplantation using pig cells, tissues and organs. Xenotransplantation is being developed in order to alleviate the reduced availability of human organs. Despite the fact that PERVs are able to infect certain human cells and cells from other species, transmission of PERVs has not been observed when animals (including non-human primates) were inoculated with PERV preparations or during preclinical xenotransplantations. The data indicate that PERVs were not transmitted because they were not released from the transplant or were inhibited by intracellular restriction factors and innate immunity in the recipient. In a single study in guinea pigs, a transient PERV infection and anti-PERV antibodies were described, indicating that in this case at least, the immune system may also have been involved.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedEndogenous RetrovirusesHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansModels, AnimalPrimatesRetroviridae InfectionsSwineTransplantation, Heterologous

Identifiers

PMID29609635
PMCPMC5879552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.