Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29609620›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

High mitochondrial sequence divergence in synanthropic flea species (Insecta: Siphonaptera) from Europe and the Mediterranean.

Sándor Hornok, Relja Beck, Róbert Farkas, Andrea Grima, Domenico Otranto, Jenő Kontschán, Nóra Takács, Gábor Horváth, Krisztina Szőke, Sándor Szekeres and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ectoparasites of the European wildcat (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Raccoons contraband - The metazoan parasite fauna of free-ranging raccoons in central Europe.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Complete mitochondrial genome ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sándor HornokDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary. Hornok.Sandor@univet.hu.ORCID 0000-0001-5449-8615
Relja BeckDepartment for Bacteriology and Parasitology, Croatian Veterinary Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.
Róbert FarkasDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Andrea GrimaDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Domenico OtrantoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Jenő KontschánPlant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Nóra TakácsDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor HorváthVeterinary Authority, Csurgó, Hungary.
Krisztina SzőkeDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Sándor SzekeresDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor MajorosDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Alexandra JuhászDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Harold SalantKoret School of Veterinary Medicine, Hebrew University, Rehovot, Israel.
Regina Hofmann-LehmannClinical Laboratory and Center for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michal StankoInstitute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovak Republic.
Gad BanethKoret School of Veterinary Medicine, Hebrew University, Rehovot, Israel.

Funding

OTKA 115854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdult fleas are haematophagous ectoparasites of warm-blooded vertebrates, particularly mammals. Among them, the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis) and the human flea (Pulex irritans) have high veterinary-medical significance, owing to their cosmopolitan distribution and role in the transmission of important vector-borne pathogens. While the taxonomy of Ct. felis has been investigated on a morphological basis during the past decades, its molecular-phylogenetic analyses have been only recently conducted. This study expands the knowledge on Ct. felis from hitherto less studied geographical regions, and includes representatives from additional flea families, less investigated with molecular approaches.

methodsFleas were collected in four countries of the Mediterranean Basin (Croatia, Italy, Malta and Israel), as well as in Hungary, from domestic and wild carnivores, rodents and humans. The DNA extracts of representative fleas (n = 148), belonging to ten species of eight genera, were used for PCR amplification of part of their cytochrome c oxidase subunits 1, 2 (cox1, cox2) and 18S rRNA genes, followed by sequencing and phylogenetic analyses.

resultsThe majority (65.6%) of Ct. felis felis cox2 sequences showed 99.4-100% similarity to each other (haplogroup A), whereas those from Malta and Israel had 98.1-98.7% sequence similarity (haplogroup B), and a third sequence from Israel (haplotype C) had as low as 96.3% sequence similarity in comparison with a reference sequence from group "A". Except for the shape of the head, no consistent morphological differences (e.g. in chaetotaxy) were found between haplogroups "A" and "C". Haplotypes of Ct. canis were genetically more homogenous, with 99.6-100% sequence similarity to each other. However, when P. irritans collected from humans was compared to those from three species of wild carnivores, these only had 96.6% cox2 similarity. The mouse flea, Leptopsylla segnis and the northern rat flea, Nosopsyllus fasciatus were both shown to have haplotypes with low intraspecific cox2 similarities (96.2 and 94.4%, respectively). Taken together, differences between mitochondrial lineages within four flea species exceeded that observed between two Chaetopsylla spp. (which had 97.3% cox2 similarity). The topologies of cox1 and cox2 phylogenetic trees were in line with relevant sequence comparisons. Conversely, 18S rRNA gene analyses only resolved differences above the species level.

conclusionsCtenocephalides felis felis, P. irritans, L. segnis and N. fasciatus were shown to have such a high level of mitochondrial gene heterogeneity, that the uniformity of these flea taxa should be reconsidered. Although the present results are limited (especially in the case of L. segnis and N. fasciatus), there appears to be no geographical or host restriction, which could explain the divergence of these genetic lineages.

Indexed as

Base SequenceGenetic VariationAnimalsCtenocephalidesEuropeFlea InfestationsHaplotypesHumansInsect VectorsMediterranean RegionMitochondriaPhylogenySiphonaptera

Identifiers

PMID29609620
PMCPMC5879554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.