Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29609604›Full record

ReviewRespiratory research2018

Airway disease phenotypes in animal models of cystic fibrosis.

Alexandra McCarron, Martin Donnelley, David Parsons

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Improvement of a mouse infection model to captureProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Functional Consequences of CFTR Interactions in Cystic Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pkhd1Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra McCarronAdelaide Medical School, Discipline of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. alexandra.mccarron@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6045-3998
Martin DonnelleyAdelaide Medical School, Discipline of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
David ParsonsAdelaide Medical School, Discipline of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Women's and Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1098127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans, cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease is characterised by chronic infection, inflammation, airway remodelling, and mucus obstruction. A lack of pulmonary manifestations in CF mouse models has hindered investigations of airway disease pathogenesis, as well as the development and testing of potential therapeutics. However, recently generated CF animal models including rat, ferret and pig models demonstrate a range of well characterised lung disease phenotypes with varying degrees of severity. This review discusses the airway phenotypes of currently available CF animal models and presents potential applications of each model in airway-related CF research.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalPhenotypeAnimalsCystic FibrosisFerretsGene Knockout TechniquesHumansMiceRatsSwineAnimal modelsCystic fibrosisLung diseasePathology

Identifiers

PMID29609604
PMCPMC5879563
OpenAlexW2802845360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.