Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29609585›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2018

The association between balance and free-living physical activity in an older community-dwelling adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ilona I McMullan, Suzanne M McDonough, Mark A Tully, Margaret Cupples, Karen Casson, Brendan P Bunting

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pilot evaluation of a dance-based physical activity program for adults with Down syndrome.Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Objectively Measured Physical Activity Is Associated with Static Balance in Young Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ilona I McMullanUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health (NI), Ulster University, Jordanstown, County Antrim, Northern Ireland.
Suzanne M McDonoughUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health (NI), Ulster University, Jordanstown, County Antrim, Northern Ireland.
Mark A TullyUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health (NI); Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland. m.tully@qub.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9710-4014
Margaret CupplesUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health (NI); Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Karen CassonInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Jordanstown, County Antrim, Northern Ireland.
Brendan P BuntingUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health (NI); Psychology Department, Ulster University, Jordanstown, County Antrim, Northern Ireland.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council MR/K023241/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor balance is associated with an increased risk of falling, disability and death in older populations. To better inform policies and help reduce the human and economic cost of falls, this novel review explores the effects of free-living physical activity on balance in older (50 years and over) healthy community-dwelling adults.

methodsSearch methods: CENTRAL, Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised register and CDSR in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and AMED were searched from inception to 7th June 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: Intervention and observational studies investigating the effects of free-living PA on balance in healthy community-dwelling adults (50 years and older). DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Thirty studies were eligible for inclusion. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently carried out by two review authors. Due to the variety of outcome measures used in studies, balance outcomes from observational studies were pooled as standardised mean differences or mean difference where appropriate and 95% confidence intervals, and outcomes from RCTs were synthesised using a best evidence approach.

resultsLimited evidence provided by a small number of RCTs, and evidence from observational studies of moderate methodological quality, suggest that free-living PA of between one and 21 years' duration improves measures of balance in older healthy community-dwelling adults. Statistical analysis of observational studies found significant effects in favour of more active groups for neuromuscular measures such as gait speed; functionality using Timed Up and Go, Single Leg Stance, and Activities of Balance Confidence Scale; flexibility using the forward reach test; and strength using the isometric knee extension test and ultrasound. A significant effect was also observed for less active groups on a single sensory measure of balance, the knee joint repositioning test.

conclusionThere is some evidence that free-living PA is effective in improving balance outcomes in older healthy adults, but future research should include higher quality studies that focus on a consensus of balance measures that are clinically relevant and explore the effects of free-living PA on balance over the longer-term.

Indexed as

Independent LivingAgedExerciseHumansMiddle AgedPostural BalanceRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID29609585
PMCPMC5879995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.