Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29609571›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Under-estimation of maternal and perinatal mortality revealed by an enhanced surveillance system: enumerating all births and deaths in Pakistan.

Jasim Anwar, Siranda Torvaldsen, Mohamud Sheikh, Richard Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Why & where perinatal deaths: trends and determinants in Pakistan.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jasim AnwarSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. j.anwar@unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9877-1695
Siranda TorvaldsenSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Mohamud SheikhSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Richard TaylorSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReliable and timely data on maternal and neonatal mortality is required to implement health interventions, monitor progress, and evaluate health programs at national and sub-national levels. In most South Asian countries, including Pakistan, vital civil registration and health information systems are inadequate. The aim of this study is to determine accurate maternal and perinatal mortality through enhanced surveillance of births and deaths, compared with prior routinely collected data.

methodsAn enhanced surveillance system was established that measured maternal, perinatal and neonatal mortality rates through more complete enumeration of births and deaths in a rural district of Pakistan. Data were collected over a period of 1 year (2015/16) from augmentation of the existing health information system covering public healthcare facilities (n = 19), and the community through 273 existing Lady Health Workers; and with the addition of private healthcare facilities (n = 10), and 73 additional Community Health Workers to cover a total study population of 368,454 consisting of 51,690 eligible women aged 18 to 49 years with 7580 pregnancies and 7273 live births over 1 year. Maternal, neonatal, perinatal and stillbirth rates and ratios were calculated, with comparisons to routine reporting from the previous period (2014-15).

resultsHigher maternal mortality, perinatal mortality and neonatal mortality rates were observed through enhanced surveillance compared to mortality rates in the previous 1.5 years from the routine monitoring system from increased completeness and coverage. Maternal mortality was 247 compared to 180 per 100, 000 live births (p = 0.36), neonatal mortality 40 compared to 20 per 1, 000 live births (p < 0.001), and perinatal mortality 60 compared to 47 per 1000 live births (p < 0.001). All the mortality rates were higher than provincial and national estimates proffered by international agencies based on successive Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys and projections.

conclusionExtension of coverage and improvement in completeness through reconciliation of data from health information systems is possible and required to obtain accurate maternal, perinatal and neonatal mortality for assessment of health service interventions at a local level.

Indexed as

Maternal MortalityPerinatal MortalityAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPakistanPopulation SurveillancePregnancyReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultHealth information systemHealth system strengtheningMaternal mortalityMortality surveillanceNeonatal mortalityPakistanPerinatal mortalityStillbirths

Identifiers

PMID29609571
PMCPMC5880001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.