Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29609422›Full record

ArticleInternational neurourology journal2018

Influence of the Short-term Intake of High Doses of Solifenacin and Trospium on Cognitive Function and Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Women With Urinary Incontinence.

Kirill Kosilov, Irina Kuzina, Sergay Loparev, Yuliya Gainullina, Liliya Kosilova, Alexandra Prokofyeva

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International neurourology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Treatment of bladder dysfunction with solifenacin: is there a risk of dementia or cognitive impairment?Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kirill KosilovDepartment of Social Sciences, School of Humanities, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0001-9747-3100
Irina KuzinaDepartment of Social Sciences, School of Humanities, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0001-9993-0133
Sergay LoparevDepartment of Urology, City polyclinic No. 3, Vladivostok, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-5344-716X
Yuliya GainullinaDepartment of Social Sciences, School of Humanities, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-7681-5447
Liliya KosilovaDepartment of Functional Diagnostics, Med. Association No. 2 of Vladivostok, Vladivostok, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0003-2680-0260
Alexandra ProkofyevaDepartment of Social Sciences, School of Humanities, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-2177-7447
Far Eastern Federal University · RUSt. Petersburg State Medical Academy "City Polyclinic №44" · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the safety and the effects of elevated doses of solifenacin and trospium on cognitive function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in elderly women receiving treatment for urinary incontinence.

methodsThe study included 312 women aged 60-83 years (mean age, 69.4 years). All participants had scored at least 24 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scale, and all of them had been diagnosed with urge urinary incontinence (UUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). The women were randomly assigned to 3 groups: group A, individuals who were simultaneously administered solifenacin at a high dosage of 20 mg per day and trospium at a high dosage of 60 mg per day; group B, persons taking solifenacin and trospium at the usual dosage of 10 and 30 mg per day, respectively; and group C, persons who received a placebo. Participants' cognitive status was assessed by the MMSE, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Wechsler Memory Scale III, Colour Trails Test, and California Verbal Learning Test scales. The HRQoL assessment was performed using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Health Survey.

resultsThe cognitive function parameters did not differ at the start and end of the study across the groups (P>0.05). Additionally, the cognitive function parameters did not differ significantly within each group between the start and end of the study (P>0.05). The values of most HRQoL parameters regarding the functional state of the lower urinary tract (LUT) after the termination of treatment significantly improved in groups A and B (P<0.05). A significant correlation between cognitive status and HRQoL or LUT parameters was absent (r<0.3), while the correlations between HRQoL and LUT parameters were r=0.31-0.83, P<0.05.

conclusionsThe use of elevated doses of solifenacin and trospium did not increase the risk of cognitive impairment in women with UUI and MUI. The combination of solifenacin and trospium at a double dosage may be recommended to elderly women with treatment-resistant symptoms of UUI and MUI. However, the safety of combining antimuscarinic drugs in women with an increased volume of residual urine requires further study.

Indexed as

Cognition disordersMuscarinic antagonistsQuality of lifeUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID29609422
PMCPMC5885132
OpenAlexW2794699293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.