Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29608974›Full record

ReviewThe journal of pain2018

Pain Neuroimaging in Humans: A Primer for Beginners and Non-Imagers.

Massieh Moayedi, Tim V Salomons, Lauren Y Atlas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Massieh MoayediFaculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Dentistry, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: m.moayedi@dentistry.utoronto.ca.
Tim V SalomonsSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK; Centre for Integrated Neuroscience and Neurodynamics, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Lauren Y AtlasNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mount Sinai Hospital · CANational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

Neural and psychological mechanisms of pain perception ZIAAT000030 · NCCIH · NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY & INTEGRATIVE HEALTH · PI ATLAS, LAUREN · 2015 to 2025
$3.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AT999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human pain neuroimaging has exploded in the past 2 decades. During this time, the broader neuroimaging community has continued to investigate and refine methods. Another key to progress is exchange with clinicians and pain scientists working with other model systems and approaches. These collaborative efforts require that non-imagers be able to evaluate and assess the evidence provided in these reports. Likewise, new trainees must design rigorous and reliable pain imaging experiments. In this article we provide a guideline for designing, reading, evaluating, analyzing, and reporting results of a pain neuroimaging experiment, with a focus on functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging. We focus in particular on considerations that are unique to neuroimaging studies of pain in humans, including study design and analysis, inferences that can be drawn from these studies, and the strengths and limitations of the approach. PERSPECTIVE: This article provides an overview of the concepts and considerations of structural and functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging studies. The primer is written for those who are not familiar with brain imaging. We review key concepts related to recruitment and study sample, experimental design, data analysis and data interpretation.

Indexed as

BrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingPainfunctional connectivityfunctional magnetic resonance imagingguidelinesmagnetic resonance imagingmultivoxel pattern analysisPainstructural magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID29608974
PMCPMC6192705
OpenAlexW2794931377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.