Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29608967›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2018

Time-to-Treatment-Failure and Related Outcomes Among 1000+ Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Comparisons Between Older Versus Younger Patients (Alliance A151711).

Ajeet Gajra, Tyler J Zemla, Aminah Jatoi, Josephine L Feliciano, Melisa L Wong, Hongbin Chen, Ronald Maggiore, Ryan P McMurray, Arti Hurria, Hyman B Muss and 5 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Clinical endpoints in oncology - a primer.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ajeet GajraState University of New York Upstate, Syracuse, New York.
Tyler J ZemlaMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Aminah JatoiMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Josephine L FelicianoThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Melisa L WongUniversity of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California.
Hongbin ChenRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
Ronald MaggioreUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Ryan P McMurrayMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Arti HurriaCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Hyman B MussUniversity of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Harvey J CohenCenter for the Study of Aging and Human Development and Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Jacqueline LafkyMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Martin J EdelmanFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Rogerio LilenbaumYale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jennifer G Le-RademacherMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: Le-Rademacher.jennifer@mayo.edu.

Funding

Collaborations and NCORP Collective ManagementUG1CA189823 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Evanthia Galanis, Olwen Hahn · 2014 to 2026
$120.6M
VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Louise C. Walter · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
Institutional Career Development Core SupplementKL2TR001870 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KANAYA, ALKA M., SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2016 to 2025
$19.7M
NCI, National Clinical Trials Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAPS) UG1 (funded extension)UG1CA232760 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Judy Caroline Boughey, Aaron Scott Mansfield · 2019 to 2026
$8.5M
Naional Cancer Institute, Naitonal Clinical Trials Network U10 Lead Academic SiteU10CA180790 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ALBERTS, STEVEN R, BOUGHEY, JUDY CAROLINE · 2014 to 2018
$6.6M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site Grant from the Roswell Cancer Inst.U10CA180866 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ERNSTOFF, MARC S, LELE, SHASHIKANT · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Sites ApplicationU10CA180838 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CAREY, LISA A · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
NCI National Clinical Trials Network U10U10CA180857 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BARBORIAK, DANIEL P, BRIZEL, DAVID M · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001870NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180790NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180838NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180857NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180866NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189823NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA232760NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTime-to-treatment-failure (TTF) is the interval from chemotherapy initiation to premature discontinuation. We evaluated TTF based on age.

methodsPooled analyses were conducted with first-line chemotherapy trials for advanced NSCLC (CALGB 9730, 30203, and 30801). Comparisons among patients who were 65 years and older and 70 years and older were performed for TTF (primary endpoint), reasons for early chemotherapy cessation, grade 3+ adverse events, and overall survival.

resultsAmong 1006 patients, 460 (46%) were older than 65 years of age. One hundred forty-five older patients (32% of this age cohort) completed all six planned chemotherapy cycles as did 170 (32%) younger patients. Median TTF was 2.9 months (95% confidence interval: 2.7- 3.2) in older patients and 3 months (95% confidence interval: 2.9-3.5) in younger patients; adjustment for performance status and stratification by chemotherapy by trial yielded no statistically significant age-based difference in TTF. However, reasons for early chemotherapy cessation differed between age groups (multivariate p = 0.004). Older patients were less likely to discontinue from cancer progression (41% versus 55%) and more likely from toxicity or patient choice (16% and 15%, respectively) compared to younger patients (13% and 6%, respectively). Older patients were more likely to experience grade 3+ adverse events (86% versus 79%) with no statistically significant difference in survival. An age cutpoint of 70+ years showed no difference in TTF, a lower trend of early cessation due to cancer progression, and somewhat shorter older patient survival.

conclusionsTTF was comparable between older and younger patients; but different, age-based, and potentially modifiable reasons account for it.

Indexed as

Time-to-TreatmentAdenocarcinomaAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDeoxycytidineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGemcitabineHumansLung NeoplasmsMalePaclitaxelPemetrexedProspective StudiesCarboplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabinePaclitaxelPemetrexedAdverse eventsChemotherapy cessationGeriatricNon–small cell lung cancerTime-to-treatment failure

Identifiers

PMID29608967
PMCPMC6015776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.