ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2018
Peak decay analysis and biointeraction studies of immunoglobulin binding and dissociation on protein G affinity microcolumns.
Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microscale Affinity Chromatography for Biointeraction Analysis: Strategies, Principles and Applications.Journal of separation science · 2026Review
- Studies and analysis of drug-target interactions by affinity chromatography and related techniques: A review.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026Review
- [Advances in chromatography in the study of drug-plasma protein interactions].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2021Review
- Recent Advances in Supramolecular Affinity Separations: Affinity Chromatography and Related Methods.Advances in chromatography · 2021Article
- Development of an on-line immunoextraction/entrapment system for protein capture and use in drug binding studies by high-performance affinity chromatography.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2020Article
- Development and evaluation of silica-based lectin microcolumns for glycoform analysis of alphaAnalytica chimica acta · 2019Article
- Solid-Supported Proteins in the Liquid Chromatography Domain to Probe Ligand-Target Interactions.Frontiers in chemistry · 2019Review
- Kinetic Analysis by Affinity Chromatography.Frontiers in chemistry · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Protein G can be a valuable binding agent for antibodies and immunoglobulins in methods such as immunosensors, chromatographic-based immunoassays, and immunoaffinity chromatography. This report used the method of peak decay analysis along with frontal analysis and zonal elution studies to characterize the binding, elution and regeneration properties of affinity microcolumns that contained immobilized protein G. Frontal analysis was employed with rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) to characterize the binding capacity of these affinity microcolumns. Zonal elution experiments looking at the retained peaks for small injections of labeled rabbit IgG were used to optimize the column regeneration conditions. Peak decay analysis was then used to look at the effects of flow rate and elution pH on the release of several types of IgG from the protein G microcolumns. This approach made it possible to obtain detailed information on the use and behavior of such columns, as could be used in future work to optimize the capture or analysis of IgG and antibodies by such devices. The same approach and tools that were used in this report could also be adapted for work with affinity columns that make use of other supports, binding agents or targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.