Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29608958›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2018

Point prevalence surveys of antimicrobial use among eight neonatal intensive care units in India: 2016.

Sumanth Gandra, Gerardo Alvarez-Uria, Srinivas Murki, Sanjeev K Singh, Ravishankar Kanithi, Dasaratha R Jinka, Ashok K Chikkappa, Sreeram Subramanian, Anita Sharma, Dhanya Dharmapalan and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Sumanth GandraCenter for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: gandra@cddep.org.
Gerardo Alvarez-UriaRural Development Trust Hospital, Bathalapalli, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Srinivas MurkiFernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Sanjeev K SinghAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Ravishankar KanithiSowmya Children's Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Dasaratha R JinkaRural Development Trust Hospital, Bathalapalli, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Ashok K ChikkappaRural Development Trust Hospital, Kalyanadurgam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Sreeram SubramanianParamitha Children's Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Anita SharmaFortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Dhanya DharmapalanYewale Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Hemasree KandrajuFernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Anil Kumar VasudevanAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Onkaraiah TungaRural Development Trust Hospital, Kalyanadurgam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Akhila AkulaSowmya Children's Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Yingfen HsiaSt. Georges University, London, United Kingdom.
Mike SharlandSt. Georges University, London, United Kingdom.
Ramanan LaxminarayanCenter for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy, New Delhi, India; Princeton University, NJ, USA.
Medical Trust Hospital · INAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre · INFernandez Hospital · INSt George's, University of London · GBCenter for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy · INFortis Hospital · INPrinceton University · USRainbow Children's Hospital · INSaifee Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation about antimicrobial use is scarce and poorly understood among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in India. In this study, we describe antimicrobial use in eight NICUs using four point prevalence surveys (PPSs).

methodsAs part of the Global Antimicrobial Resistance, Prescribing, and Efficacy in Neonates and Children (GARPEC) study, one-day, cross-sectional, hospital-based PPSs were conducted four times between 1 February 2016 and 28 February 2017 in eight NICUs. Using a standardized web-based electronic data entry form, detailed data were collected for babies on antimicrobials.

resultsA total of 403 babies were admitted to NICUs across all survey days, and 208 (51.6%) were prescribed one or more antimicrobials. Among 208 babies, 155 (74.5%) were prescribed antimicrobials for treatment of an active infection. Among 155 babies with an active infection, treatment was empiric in 109 (70.3%). Sepsis (108, 49.1%) was the most common reason for prescribing antimicrobials. Amikacin (17%) followed by meropenem (12%) were the two most commonly prescribed antimicrobials. For community-acquired sepsis, piperacillin-tazobactam (17.5%) was the most commonly prescribed drug. A combination of ampicillin and gentamicin was prescribed in only two babies (5%).

conclusionsThe recommended first-line antimicrobial agents, ampicillin and gentamicin, were rarely prescribed in Indian NICUs for community acquired neonatal sepsis.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsGuideline AdherenceIntensive Care Units, NeonatalAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal SepsisPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrevalenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial useIndiaNeonatesNICUPoint prevalence survey

Identifiers

PMID29608958
PMCPMC5985371
OpenAlexW2794510297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.