Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29608799›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2018

One-stop microvascular screening service: an effective model for the early detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and the high-risk foot.

O Binns-Hall, D Selvarajah, D Sanger, J Walker, A Scott, S Tesfaye

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04306289 (Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04306289 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Pain Associated With Diabetic Neuropathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Rome Tor VergataRan2020 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsDiabetic Neuropathies, Chronic PainArmstranscranial direct current stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Is the 10 g monofilament fit for purpose for diagnosing DPN?BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

O Binns-HallDepartment of Podiatry Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
D SelvarajahDepartment of Diabetes, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
D SangerDepartment of Podiatry Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
J WalkerDepartment of Podiatry Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
A ScottDepartment of Oncology and Human Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
S TesfayeDepartment of Oncology and Human Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1190-1472
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the feasibility of a one-stop microvascular screening service for the early diagnosis of diabetic distal symmetrical polyneuropathy, painful distal symmetrical polyneuropathy and the at-risk diabetic foot.

methodsPeople with diabetes attending retinal screening in hospital and community settings had their feet examined by a podiatrist. Assessment included: Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score evaluation; a 10-g monofilament test; and two validated, objective and quick measures of neuropathy obtained using the point-of-care devices 'DPN-Check', a hand-held device that measures sural nerve conduction velocity and amplitude, and 'Sudoscan', a device that measures sudomotor function. The diagnostic utility of these devices was assessed against the Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score as the 'gold standard'.

resultsA total of 236 consecutive people attending the retinal screening service, 18.9% of whom had never previously had their feet examined, were evaluated. The prevalence of distal symmetrical polyneuropathy, assessed using the Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score, was 30.9%, and was underestimated by 10-g monofilament test (14.4%). The prevalence of distal symmetrical polyneuropathy using DPN-check was 51.5% (84.3% sensitivity, 68.3% specificity), 38.2% using Sudoscan foot electrochemical skin conductance (77.4% sensitivity, 68.3% specificity), and 61.9% using abnormality in either of the results (93.2% sensitivity, 52.8% specificity). The results of both devices correlated with Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (P<0.001). A new diagnosis of painful distal symmetrical polyneuropathy was made in 59 participants (25%), and 56.6% had moderate- or high-risk foot. Participants rated the service very highly.

conclusionsCombined, eye, foot and renal screening is feasible, has a high uptake, reduces clinic visits, and identifies painful distal symmetrical polyneuropathy and the at-risk foot. Combined large- and small-nerve-fibre assessment using non-invasive, quantitative and quick point-of-care devices may be an effective model for the early diagnosis of distal symmetrical polyneuropathy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDelivery of Health CareDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic FootDiabetic NeuropathiesDiabetic RetinopathyDisease ManagementEarly DiagnosisFeasibility StudiesFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID29608799
PMCPMC6033008
OpenAlexW2796208760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.