Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29608719›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

The Prevalence and Evolutionary Conservation of Inverted Repeats in Proteobacteria.

Bar Lavi, Eli Levy Karin, Tal Pupko, Einat Hazkani-Covo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Generation of de novo miRNAs from template switching during DNA replication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Mutation bias and adaptation in bacteria.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Template switching in DNA replication can create and maintain RNA hairpins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. PCIR: a database of Plant Chloroplast Inverted Repeats.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bar LaviDepartment of Cell Research and Immunology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Eli Levy KarinDepartment of Cell Research and Immunology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Tal PupkoDepartment of Cell Research and Immunology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Einat Hazkani-CovoDepartment of Natural and Life Sciences, The Open University of Israel, Ra'anana, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perfect short inverted repeats (IRs) are known to be enriched in a variety of bacterial and eukaryotic genomes. Currently, it is unclear whether perfect IRs are conserved over evolutionary time scales. In this study, we aimed to characterize the prevalence and evolutionary conservation of IRs across 20 proteobacterial strains. We first identified IRs in Escherichia coli K-12 substr MG1655 and showed that they are overabundant. We next aimed to test whether this overabundance is reflected in the conservation of IRs over evolutionary time scales. To this end, for each perfect IR identified in E. coli MG1655, we collected orthologous sequences from related proteobacterial genomes. We next quantified the evolutionary conservation of these IRs, that is, the presence of the exact same IR across orthologous regions. We observed high conservation of perfect IRs: out of the 234 examined orthologous regions, 145 were more conserved than expected, which is statistically significant even after correcting for multiple testing. Our results together with previous experimental findings support a model in which imperfect IRs are corrected to perfect IRs in a preferential manner via a template switching mechanism.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularConserved SequenceEscherichia coliGenome, BacterialInverted Repeat SequencesProteobacteria

Identifiers

PMID29608719
PMCPMC5941160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.