Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29608684›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthodontics2019

Microsphere controlled drug delivery for local control of tooth movement.

Inna Sydorak, Ming Dang, Sarah J Baxter, Michael Halcomb, Peter Ma, Sunil Kapila, Nan Hatch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthodontics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Inna SydorakDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Ming DangMacromolecular Science and Engineering Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Sarah J BaxterDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Michael HalcombDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Peter MaMacromolecular Science and Engineering Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Sunil KapilaDivision of Orthodontics, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Nan HatchDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Structure, Composition, & Histology Core - Core BP30AR069620 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KARL J JEPSEN · 2016 to 2026
$8.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Because orthodontic tooth movement is dependent upon osteoclast-mediated resorption of alveolar bone adjacent to the pressure side of tooth roots, biologic mediators that regulate osteoclasts can be utilized to control tooth movement. Objectives: To develop a novel method to locally enhance orthodontic anchorage. Methods: We encapsulated osteoprotegerin (OPG) in polymer microspheres and tested the effectiveness of microsphere encapsulated versus non-encapsulated OPG for enhancing orthodontic anchorage in a rodent model of tooth movement. A single injection of 1 mg/kg non-encapsulated or microsphere encapsulated OPG was delivered into the palatal mucosa mesial to the first maxillary molar 1 day prior to tooth movement. A positive control group received injections of 5 mg/kg non-encapsulated OPG every 3 days during tooth movement. After 28 days of tooth movement, hemi-maxillae and femurs were dissected. Molar mesial and incisor distal tooth movement was measured using stone casts that were scanned and magnified. Local alveolar, distant femur bone, and tooth root volumes were analyzed by micro computed tomography. Serum OPG levels were measured by ELISA. Osteoclast numbers were quantified by histomorphometry. Results: The single injection of microsphere encapsulated OPG significantly enhanced orthodontic anchorage, while the single injection of non-encapsulated OPG did not. Injection of encapsulated OPG inhibited molar mesial movement but did not inhibit incisor tooth movement, and did not alter alveolar or femur bone volume fraction, density, or mineral content. Multiple injections of 5 mg/kg non-encapsulated OPG enhanced orthodontic anchorage, but also inhibited incisor retraction and altered alveolar and femur bone quality parameters. Increased OPG levels were found only in animals receiving multiple injections of non-encapsulated 5 mg/kg OPG. Osteoclast numbers were higher upon tooth movement in animals that did not receive OPG. Osteoclast numbers in OPG injected animals were variable within groups. Conclusions: Microsphere encapsulation of OPG allows for controlled drug release, and enhances site-specific orthodontic anchorage without systemic side effects. With additional refinements, this drug delivery system could be applicable to a broad array of potential biologic orthodontic therapeutics.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone ResorptionDrug Delivery SystemsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFemurIncisorMaleMicrospheresMolarOrthodontic Anchorage ProceduresOsteoclastsOsteoprotegerinRats, Sprague-DawleyTooth Movement TechniquesX-Ray MicrotomographyOsteoprotegerinTnfrsf11b protein, rat

Identifiers

PMID29608684
PMCPMC6343727
OpenAlexW2794678010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.