Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29608611›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Specifically bound lambda repressor dimers promote adjacent non-specific binding.

Suparna Sarkar-Banerjee, Sachin Goyal, Ning Gao, John Mack, Benito Thompson, David Dunlap, Krishnananda Chattopadhyay, Laura Finzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suparna Sarkar-BanerjeeProtein Folding and Dynamics Laboratory, Structural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India.
Sachin GoyalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Merced, CA, United States of America.
Ning GaoPhysics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
John MackPhysics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Benito ThompsonPhysics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
David DunlapPhysics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Krishnananda ChattopadhyayProtein Folding and Dynamics Laboratory, Structural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India.
Laura FinziPhysics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1173-5339

Funding

The lambda bacteriophage regulatory loopR01GM084070 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FINZI, LAURA · 2009 to 2021
$4.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic switches frequently include DNA loops secured by proteins. Recent studies of the lambda bacteriophage repressor (CI), showed that this arrangement in which the protein links two sets of three operators separated by approximately 2.3 kbp, optimizes both the stability and dynamics of DNA loops, compared to an arrangement with just two sets of two operators. Because adjacent dimers interact pairwise, we hypothesized that the odd number of operators in each set of the lambda regulatory system might have evolved to allow for semi-specific, pair-wise interactions that add stability to the loop while maintaining it dynamic. More generally, additional CI dimers may bind non-specifically to flanking DNA sequences making the genetic switch more sensitive to CI concentration. Here, we tested this hypothesis using spectroscopic and imaging approaches to study the binding of the lambda repressor (CI) dimer protein to DNA fragments. For fragments with only one operator and a short flanking sequence, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy measurements clearly indicated the presence of two distinct DNA-CI complexes; one is thought to have a non-specifically bound CI dimer on the flanking sequence. Scanning force micrographs of CI bound to DNA with all six operators revealed wild-type or mutant proteins bound at operator positions. The number of bound, wild-type proteins increased with CI concentration and was larger than expected for strictly specific binding to operators. In contrast, a mutant that fails to oligomerize beyond a dimer, D197G, only bound to operators. These data are evidence that CI cooperativity promotes oligomerization that extends from operator sites to influence the thermodynamics and kinetics of CI-mediated looping.

Indexed as

Protein MultimerizationBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacteriophage lambdaBinding SitesDNA-Binding ProteinsGene OrderMutationPorinsProtein BindingReceptors, VirusBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsmaltoporinsPorinsReceptors, Virus

Identifiers

PMID29608611
PMCPMC5880393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.