Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29608597›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A clinical study of peroral endoscopic myotomy reveals that impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in achalasia is not only defined by high-resolution manometry.

Hiroki Sato, Kazuya Takahashi, Ken-Ichi Mizuno, Satoru Hashimoto, Junji Yokoyama, Shuji Terai

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Esophageal Third Space Endoscopy: Recent Advances.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroki SatoDivision of Gastroenterology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7766-3724
Kazuya TakahashiDivision of Gastroenterology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Ken-Ichi MizunoDivision of Gastroenterology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Satoru HashimotoDivision of Gastroenterology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Junji YokoyamaDivision of Gastroenterology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Shuji TeraiDivision of Gastroenterology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital · JPSaiseikai Niigata Daini Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimAchalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by impaired lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation. On high-resolution manometry (HRM), impaired LES relaxation is defined by elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). However, a new category of achalasia within the normal IRP range has been suggested.

methodsHRM was performed using a Starlet device and an IRP threshold of 26 mmHg. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) was performed for cases of achalasia diagnosed using established methods. During POEM, the histology of the LES was assessed. Follow-up was performed 2 months post-operatively.

resultsForty-one patients with achalasia (18 women, mean age 53 ± 18.6 years) were included. Among them, 27 were placed in the IRP > 26 mmHg subgroup (impaired LES relaxation on HRM) and 14 in the IRP ≤ 26 mmHg subgroup (normal LES relaxation on HRM). In the IRP ≤ 26 mmHg subgroup, patients were older, had longer symptom duration, and had more esophageal dilation. The IRP ≤ 26 mmHg subgroup had the same symptom severity as the higher IRP subgroup and POEM significantly improved symptoms and IRP, although four patients still had severe LES fibrosis.

conclusionsThe clinical presentation of achalasia has a gap between a HRM-defined impaired LES relaxation, with aging or disease progression considered reasons for a lowered LES pressure. POEM can be a feasible treatment option, even for cases of achalasia with a normal IRP. However, patients with severe LES fibrosis need more attention for the therapeutic indication.

Indexed as

Muscle RelaxationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingEsophageal AchalasiaEsophageal Sphincter, LowerEsophagoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleManometryMiddle AgedMyotomyNatural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery

Identifiers

PMID29608597
PMCPMC5880396
OpenAlexW2796283823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.