Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29608554›Full record

ArticleNature methods2018

Specter: linear deconvolution for targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry proteomics.

Ryan Peckner, Samuel A Myers, Alvaro Sebastian Vaca Jacome, Jarrett D Egertson, Jennifer G Abelin, Michael J MacCoss, Steven A Carr, Jacob D Jaffe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Dear-DIAResearch (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Article
  20. Resolving isobaric interferences in direct infusion tandem mass spectrometry.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryan PecknerProteomics Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Samuel A MyersProteomics Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Alvaro Sebastian Vaca JacomeProteomics Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jarrett D EgertsonDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jennifer G AbelinProteomics Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael J MacCossDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1853-0256
Steven A CarrProteomics Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7203-4299
Jacob D JaffeProteomics Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9845-1210

Funding

There and Back Again: Epigenetic Reinforcement of Cellular Signaling States - OverallU54HG008097 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI PAPANASTASIOU, MARTHA MALVINA, SUBRAMANIAN, ARAVIND · 2014 to 2019
$9.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG008097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry with data-independent acquisition (DIA) is a promising method to improve the comprehensiveness and reproducibility of targeted and discovery proteomics, in theory by systematically measuring all peptide precursors in a biological sample. However, the analytical challenges involved in discriminating between peptides with similar sequences in convoluted spectra have limited its applicability in important cases, such as the detection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and alternative site localizations in phosphoproteomics data. We report Specter (https://github.com/rpeckner-broad/Specter), an open-source software tool that uses linear algebra to deconvolute DIA mixture spectra directly through comparison to a spectral library, thus circumventing the problems associated with typical fragment-correlation-based approaches. We validate the sensitivity of Specter and its performance relative to that of other methods, and show that Specter is able to successfully analyze cases involving highly similar peptides that are typically challenging for DIA analysis methods.

Indexed as

ProteomicsMass SpectrometryPeptide LibraryPeptidesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProteomeReproducibility of ResultsSoftwarePeptide LibraryPeptidesProteome

Identifiers

PMID29608554
PMCPMC5924490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.