Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29608256›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

Aging-related prognosis analysis of definitive radiotherapy for very elderly esophageal cancer.

Yong-Chun Zhou, Li-Li Chen, Hong-Bo Xu, Qian Sun, Qi Zhang, Han-Fei Cai, Hao Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yong-Chun ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, No. 287, Chang Huai Road, Bengbu, 233000, China.
Li-Li ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, No. 287, Chang Huai Road, Bengbu, 233000, China.
Hong-Bo XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, No. 287, Chang Huai Road, Bengbu, 233000, China.
Qian SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, No. 287, Chang Huai Road, Bengbu, 233000, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, No. 287, Chang Huai Road, Bengbu, 233000, China.
Han-Fei CaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, No. 287, Chang Huai Road, Bengbu, 233000, China.
Hao JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, No. 287, Chang Huai Road, Bengbu, 233000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7200-5087

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the exclusion for the patients more than 75 years (very elderly patients) in many clinical trials of esophageal cancer (EC), there is no consensus on prognosis and treatment for this population. We aim to evaluate the outcomes and aging-related prognostic factors of definitive radiotherapy (RT) for very elderly EC patients. We retrospectively analyzed 149 very elderly EC patients consecutively treated between January 2015 and June 2016 by definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with or without chemotherapy. The clinical outcome and toxicities were assessed, and the potential prognostic factors, such as nutritional risk index (NRI) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), were analyzed statistically. The median follow-up time for survivors was 22.5 months. The 2-year overall survival (OS), local-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 51.6%, 54.7%, and 85.2%, respectively. Independent predictors for poorer OS were higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, lower NRI, and higher NLR value before RT. Meanwhile, the total dose (cutoff value 60 Gy) of planning gross tumor volume (PGTV) and chemotherapy was also identified as independent prognostic indicator for LRFFS and DMFS, respectively. 72 patients had treatment failure and 58 (80.6%), 6 (8.3%), and 18 (25.0%) patients had experienced local, regional, and distant failure, respectively. Few severe toxicities were observed. The conservative definitive RT with modern technique was effective for very elderly EC patients in short term with low rate and tolerable toxicities. Local residue or recurrence was the most common failure pattern. The aging-related prognostic factors concerned nutrition and immune, such as NRI and NLR before RT, should be considered for use in future clinical practice.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMalePrognosisRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRetrospective StudiesTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeConcurrent chemoradiationdefinitive radiotherapyneutrophil-lymphocyte rationutritional risk indexvery elderly esophageal cancer

Identifiers

PMID29608256
PMCPMC5943545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.