Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29608177›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2018

Batch effects in single-cell RNA-sequencing data are corrected by matching mutual nearest neighbors.

Laleh Haghverdi, Aaron T L Lun, Michael D Morgan, John C Marioni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,393 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,393citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,393 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dysregulated mScience advances · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Best practices for using biological data in psychological research.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,333 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laleh HaghverdiEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK.
Aaron T L LunCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3564-4813
Michael D MorganWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0757-0711
John C MarioniEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22231Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data sets that are produced in different laboratories and at different times contain batch effects that may compromise the integration and interpretation of the data. Existing scRNA-seq analysis methods incorrectly assume that the composition of cell populations is either known or identical across batches. We present a strategy for batch correction based on the detection of mutual nearest neighbors (MNNs) in the high-dimensional expression space. Our approach does not rely on predefined or equal population compositions across batches; instead, it requires only that a subset of the population be shared between batches. We demonstrate the superiority of our approach compared with existing methods by using both simulated and real scRNA-seq data sets. Using multiple droplet-based scRNA-seq data sets, we demonstrate that our MNN batch-effect-correction method can be scaled to large numbers of cells.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisData AnalysisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29608177
PMCPMC6152897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.