Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29608137›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2018

Mechanisms and functions of cellular senescence.

Nicolás Herranz, Jesús Gil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 729 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
729citing papers in PubMed
43.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

729 citing papers in PubMed, 1,118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Aqueous Extract ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Evolutionary genetics of ageing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. NADAging cell · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Senolytics Reverse PMCardiovascular toxicology · 2026
    Article
  18. Infection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

669 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolás HerranzMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Jesús GilMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U120085810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular senescence is a highly stable cell cycle arrest that is elicited in response to different stresses. By imposing a growth arrest, senescence limits the replication of old or damaged cells. Besides exiting the cell cycle, senescent cells undergo many other phenotypic alterations such as metabolic reprogramming, chromatin rearrangement, or autophagy modulation. In addition, senescent cells produce and secrete a complex combination of factors, collectively referred as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype, that mediate most of their non-cell-autonomous effects. Because senescent cells influence the outcome of a variety of physiological and pathological processes, including cancer and age-related diseases, pro-senescent and anti-senescent therapies are actively being explored. In this Review, we discuss the mechanisms regulating different aspects of the senescence phenotype and their functional implications. This knowledge is essential to improve the identification and characterization of senescent cells in vivo and will help to develop rational strategies to modulate the senescence program for therapeutic benefit.

Indexed as

AgingAutophagyCellular SenescenceNeoplasmsAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID29608137
PMCPMC5873888
OpenAlexW2795010312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.