Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29607800›Full record

Trial reportPublic health nutrition2018

Feasibility and impact study of a reward-based mobile application to improve adolescents' snacking habits.

Nathalie De Cock, Wendy Van Lippevelde, Jolien Vangeel, Melissa Notebaert, Kathleen Beullens, Steven Eggermont, Benedicte Deforche, Lea Maes, Lien Goossens, Sandra Verbeken and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Nathalie De Cock1Department of Food Safety and Food Quality,Ghent University,Coupure Links 653,Ghent 9000,Belgium.
Wendy Van Lippevelde2Department of Public Health,Ghent University,Ghent,Belgium.
Jolien Vangeel3Leuven School for Mass Communication Research,KU Leuven,Leuven,Belgium.
Melissa Notebaert3Leuven School for Mass Communication Research,KU Leuven,Leuven,Belgium.
Kathleen Beullens3Leuven School for Mass Communication Research,KU Leuven,Leuven,Belgium.
Steven Eggermont3Leuven School for Mass Communication Research,KU Leuven,Leuven,Belgium.
Benedicte Deforche2Department of Public Health,Ghent University,Ghent,Belgium.
Lea Maes2Department of Public Health,Ghent University,Ghent,Belgium.
Lien Goossens5Department of Developmental,Personality and Social Psychology,Ghent University,Ghent,Belgium.
Sandra Verbeken5Department of Developmental,Personality and Social Psychology,Ghent University,Ghent,Belgium.
Ellen Moens5Department of Developmental,Personality and Social Psychology,Ghent University,Ghent,Belgium.
Leentje Vervoort5Department of Developmental,Personality and Social Psychology,Ghent University,Ghent,Belgium.
Caroline Braet5Department of Developmental,Personality and Social Psychology,Ghent University,Ghent,Belgium.
Lieven Huybregts6Poverty,Health and Nutrition Division,International Food Policy Research Institute,Washington DC,USA.
Patrick Kolsteren1Department of Food Safety and Food Quality,Ghent University,Coupure Links 653,Ghent 9000,Belgium.
John Van Camp1Department of Food Safety and Food Quality,Ghent University,Coupure Links 653,Ghent 9000,Belgium.
Carl Lachat1Department of Food Safety and Food Quality,Ghent University,Coupure Links 653,Ghent 9000,Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAdolescents' snacking habits are driven by both explicit reflective and implicit hedonic processes. Hedonic pathways and differences in sensitivity to food rewards in addition to reflective determinants should be considered. The present study evaluated the feasibility and impact of a mobile phone-delivered intervention, incorporating explicit reflective and implicit rewarding strategies, on adolescents' snack intake.

designAdolescents (n 988; mean age 14·9 (sd 0·70) years, 59·4 % boys) completed a non-randomized clustered controlled trial. Adolescents (n 416) in the intervention schools (n 3) were provided with the intervention application for four weeks, while adolescents (n 572) in the control schools (n 3) followed the regular curriculum. Outcomes were differences in healthy snacking ratio and key determinants (awareness, intention, attitude, self-efficacy, habits and knowledge). Process evaluation data were collected via questionnaires and through log data of the app.

resultsNo significant positive intervention effects on the healthy snack ratio (b=-3·52 (se 1·82), P>0·05) or targeted determinants were observed. Only 268 adolescents started using the app, of whom only fifty-five (20·5 %) still logged in after four weeks. Within the group of users, higher exposure to the app was not significantly associated with positive intervention effects. App satisfaction ratings were low in both high and low user groups. Moderation analyses revealed small positive intervention effects on the healthy snack ratio in high compared with low reward-sensitive boys (b=1·38 (se 0·59), P<0·05).

conclusionsThe intervention was not able to improve adolescents' snack choices, due to low reach and exposure. Future interventions should consider multicomponent interventions, teacher engagement, exhaustive participatory app content development and tailoring.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMobile ApplicationsRewardSnacksAdolescentDietFeasibility StudiesFeeding BehaviorFemaleHabitsHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentsHealthy snackingImpactInterventionSmartphone app

Identifiers

PMID29607800
PMCPMC11106033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.