Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29607504›Full record

ArticleContact dermatitis2018

Specific barrier response profiles after experimentally induced skin irritation in vivo.

Maryam Soltanipoor, Tasja Stilla, Christoph Riethmüller, Jacob P Thyssen, Judith K Sluiter, Thomas Rustemeyer, Tobias W Fischer, Sanja Kezic, Irena Angelova-Fischer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contact dermatitis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Similar Skin Barrier Function in Persons with Type 1 Diabetes Compared with Healthy Controls.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maryam SoltanipoorCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tasja StillaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Christoph RiethmüllerCentre for Nanotechnology, Serend-ip GmbH, Centre for Nanotechnology, Münster, Germany.
Jacob P ThyssenNational Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev-Gentofte, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
Judith K SluiterCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas RustemeyerDepartment of Dermatology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tobias W FischerDepartment of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Sanja KezicCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-4547
Irena Angelova-FischerDepartment of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases · NLUniversity of Lübeck · DEAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCeNTech · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, natural moisturizing factors (NMFs) and corneocyte surface topography were suggested as biomarkers for irritant dermatitis.

objectivesTo investigate how exposure to different irritants influences corneocyte surface topography, NMF levels and the barrier function of human skin in vivo.

methodsEight healthy adult volunteers were exposed to aqueous solutions of 60% n-propanol, 0.5% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), 0.15% sodium hydroxide, and 2.0% acetic acid, and distilled water, in a repeated irritation test over a period of 96 hours. Erythema, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin hydration, the dermal texture index (DTI) and NMF levels were measured at baseline, and after 24 and 96 hours.

resultsSLS and sodium hydroxide had the most pronounced effects on erythema and TEWL. Although n-propanol caused only slight changes in TEWL and erythema, it showed pronounced effects on skin hydration, NMF levels, and the DTI. NMF was the only parameter that was significantly altered by all investigated irritants. The changes in the DTI were inversely associated with NMF levels and skin hydration.

conclusionSkin barrier impairment and the inflammatory response are irritant-specific, emphasizing the need for a multiparametric approach to the study of skin irritation. NMF levels seem to be the most sensitive parameter in detecting irritant-induced skin barrier alterations.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersDermatitis, IrritantFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansIrritantsMaleMiddle AgedSkin Physiological PhenomenaBiomarkersIrritantsbiomarkersirritant contact dermatitisskin barrier

Identifiers

PMID29607504
PMCPMC6099430
OpenAlexW2796101740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.