Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29607465›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2018

Sirolimus enhances remission induction in patients with high risk acute myeloid leukemia and mTORC1 target inhibition.

Margaret T Kasner, Rosemarie Mick, Grace R Jeschke, Matthew Carabasi, Joanne Filicko-O'Hara, Neal Flomenberg, Noelle V Frey, Elizabeth O Hexner, Selina M Luger, Alison W Loren and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Targeting regulated cell death pathways in acute myeloid leukemia.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2023
    Review
  11. The dual role of autophagy in acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Dually Efficacious Medicine Against Fibrosis and Cancer.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret T KasnerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rosemarie MickDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Grace R JeschkeDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Matthew CarabasiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Joanne Filicko-O'HaraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Neal FlomenbergDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Noelle V FreyDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elizabeth O HexnerDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Selina M LugerDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alison W LorenDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
James K ManganDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
John L WagnerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mark WeissDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Martin CarrollDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexander E PerlDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. alexander.perl@uphs.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELLEY L BERGER · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
mTOR Inhibition as a Therapeutic Strategy for Acute Myeloid LeukemiaK23CA141054 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PERL, ALEXANDER E. · 2010 to 2014
$862k
NCI NIH HHS K23 CA141054NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1) inhibitors enhance chemotherapy response in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) cells in vitro. However whether inhibiting mTORC1 enhances clinical response to AML chemotherapy remains controversial. We previously optimized measurement of mTORC1's kinase activity in AML blasts during clinical trials using serial phospho-specific flow cytometry of formaldehyde-fixed whole blood or marrow specimens. To validate mTORC1 as a therapeutic target in AML, we performed two clinical trials combining an mTORC1 inhibitor (sirolimus) and MEC (mitoxantrone, etoposide, cytarabine) in patients with relapsed, refractory, or untreated high-risk AML. Methods Flow cytometric measurements of ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation (pS6) were performed before and during sirolimus treatment to determine whether mTORC1 inhibition enriched for chemotherapy response. Results In 51 evaluable subjects, the overall response rate (ORR) to the combination regimen was 47% (95% confidence interval 33-61%, 33% CR, 2% CRi, 12% PR) and similar toxicity to historic experience with MEC alone. 37 subjects had baseline pS6 measured pre-sirolimus, of whom 27 (73%) exhibited mTORC1 activity. ORR was not significantly different between subjects with and without baseline mTORC1 activity (52% vs 40%, respectively, p = 0.20). The ORR among subjects with baseline target activation and mTORC1 inhibition during therapy was 71% (12/17) compared to 20% (2/10) in subjects without target inhibition. Conclusions Fixed, whole blood pS6 by flow cytometry may be a predictive biomarker for clinical response to mTORC1 inhibitor-based regimens. These data provide clinical confirmation that mTORC1 activation mediates chemotherapy resistance in patients with AML.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytarabineEtoposideFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Middle AgedMitoxantronePhosphorylationPilot ProjectsRemission InductionSignal TransductionSirolimusCytarabineEtoposideMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1MitoxantroneSirolimusAcute myeloid leukemiaBiomarkermTORmTORC1Phospho-flow cytometry

Identifiers

PMID29607465
PMCPMC6060002
OpenAlexW2795825392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.