Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29607458›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2018

Impact of high magnification sperm selection on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective study.

Olivier Gaspard, Pierre Vanderzwalmen, Barbara Wirleitner, Stéphanie Ravet, Frédéric Wenders, Verena Eichel, Alice Mocková, Dietmar Spitzer, Caroline Jouan, Virginie Gridelet and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Novel Techniques of Sperm Selection for Improving IVF and ICSI Outcomes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Olivier GaspardCentre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium. olivier.gaspard@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9688-0943
Pierre VanderzwalmenIVF-Centers Prof. Zech, Bregenz, Austria.
Barbara WirleitnerIVF-Centers Prof. Zech, Bregenz, Austria.
Stéphanie RavetCentre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Frédéric WendersCentre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Verena EichelIVF-Centers Prof. Zech, Bregenz, Austria.
Alice MockováDepartment of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen and University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dietmar SpitzerIVF-Centers Prof. Zech, Salzburg, Austria.
Caroline JouanCentre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Virginie GrideletCentre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Henri MartensGIGA I3, Center of Immunoendocrinology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Laurie HenryCentre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Herbert ZechIVF-Centers Prof. Zech, Bregenz, Austria.
Sophie Perrier d'HauteriveCentre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Michelle NisolleCentre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to compare the effect of the deselection of spermatozoa presenting vacuole-like structures using IMSI (intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection) with ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) by means of neonatal outcomes.

methodsIn a retrospective two-center analysis, a total of 848 successful IMSI or ICSI cycles ending with a live birth, induced abortion, or intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) were included.

resultsThe IMSI and ICSI groups included 332 and 655 babies or fetuses, respectively. The parents were older in the IMSI group than in the ICSI group (mothers were 35.1 vs 32.9 years, and fathers were 39.1 vs 36.2 years). The multiple pregnancy rate was higher in the IMSI group. The mean pregnancy duration and mean birth weight were almost identical in both groups. There was no significant difference in major congenital malformations between the two groups. However, this rate was decreased in the IMSI group compared to that in the ICSI group (1.8 vs 3.2%), the difference being mainly found in singletons (1.4 vs 3.3%). Boys were more often affected than girls in both groups. The percentages of chromosomal abnormalities did not differ between the IMSI and ICSI groups (0.6 and 0.8%). The reported congenital malformations mainly affected the heart, urogenital, and musculoskeletal systems.

conclusionsIn the present study, the malformation rates observed in the IMSI and ICSI groups were not significantly different, even if slightly lower after IMSI. However, the observed difference followed the same trends observed in previous reports, indicating the possible impact of IMSI on decreasing congenital malformation occurrences. This highlights the necessity to prospectively evaluate the impact of IMSI on neonatal outcome after IVF treatment.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferAdultFemaleHumansInfertility, MaleMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesSpermatozoaSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicIntracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injectionMajor congenital malformationsNeonatal outcomesSpermatozoa selectionVacuole-like structures

Identifiers

PMID29607458
PMCPMC6030008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.