ArticleEndoscopy international open2018
Perspectives on endoscopic submucosal dissection training in the United States: a survey analysis.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces procedure time and risk of serious adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- Real-world practices and barriers in endoscopic submucosal dissection training: International comprehensive survey.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Giant gastric leiomyoma excision using endoscopic submucosal dissection with dental floss clip traction technique: a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Review
- Comparison of scissor-type knife to non-scissor-type knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- A Nationwide Survey of Training Pathways and Practice Trends of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Canada.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Treatment for T1 colorectal cancers substratified by site and size: "horses for courses".Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- A survey of physician training and credentialing in endoscopic submucosal dissection in the United States.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Endoscopic resection of superficial bowel neoplasia: The unmet needs in the Egyptian practice.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Article
- Comparative Outcomes of Cap Assisted Endoscopic Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022Article
- Pilot prospective study on formal training in per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) during advanced endoscopy fellowship.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Scissor-type knife improves the safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) among endoscopists without experience in ESD: a randomized ex vivo study.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Overutilization of surgery for superficial gastric carcinoma in USA: is it still the case in 2020?Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Variation in colectomy rates for benign polyp and colorectal cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- The impact of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenocarcinomas in the United States.Techniques and innovations in gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2020Article
- Haemostasis treatment using dual red imaging during endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Introduction of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY
aimsEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted method for en-bloc resection of dysplastic lesions and early cancer in Asia and Europe. A limiting factor in adoption of ESD in the United States is perceived lack of training opportunities. The aims of this study were to: (1) evaluate ESD experience of attendees at a University-sponsored ESD training course; (2) characterize effectiveness of the current ESD training regimen and its impact on ESD adoption in the United States; and (3) gauge trainees' attitude towards ESD. PATIENTS AND
methodsAn electronic anonymous survey was distributed to the 86 physicians who participated in the University of Florida's annual ESD course from 2014 to 2016. Main outcomes included participants' practice setting, prior training, current ESD techniques, and planned training.
resultsA total of 34 participants (40 %) completed the survey. Most of the respondents routinely use one or more endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques (97.1 %) in their practice. Most respondents (79 %) had no experience with ESD on humans prior to the ESD course. Following completion of course training, more participants reported ongoing hands-on ESD exposure, with 15/34 (44 %) having performed ESD in humans. Most participants identified potential hurdles for adoption of ESD.
conclusionA dedicated ESD training course with hands-on experience, under the guidance of experts, notably increased use of ESD among participants. Limited availability of structured training opportunities, concerns over procedural length, lack of adequate number of lesions, and potential for serious adverse events (AEs) were identified as the main factors slowing adoption of ESD in the United States.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.