Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29607094›Full record

ArticleBDJ open2018

Assessment of information resources for people with hypodontia.

Sophy Barber, Sue Pavitt, David Meads, Balvinder Khambay, Hilary Bekker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BDJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Google or your dentist?British dental journal · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophy BarberOrthodontic Department, Leeds Dental Instsitute, Clarendon Way, Leeds, UK.
Sue PavittSchool of Dentistry, Level 6, Worsley Building, Clarendon, Way, Leeds LS2 9LU, UK.
David MeadsLeeds Institute of Health Science, Level 10, Worsley Building, Clarendon, Way, Leeds LS2 9LJ, UK.
Balvinder KhambaySchool of Dentistry, Level 6, Worsley Building, Clarendon, Way, Leeds LS2 9LU, UK.
Hilary BekkerLeeds Institute of Health Science, Level 10, Worsley Building, Clarendon, Way, Leeds LS2 9LJ, UK.
Leeds Dental Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the adequacy of patient information to support understanding and decision-making for people affected by hypodontia.

methods1) Questionnaire to understand the provision of patient information by dentists; 2) Systematic search to identify online open-access patient information; 3) Quality assessment of written patient information.

resultsQuestionnaire response rate was 49% (319/649); 91% examined and/or treated people with hypodontia. Most general dentists referred patients to specialist services without providing written hypodontia information. The majority of dental specialists provide patient leaflets but less than a third used web-resources. Only 19% of respondents felt current resources were fit-for-purpose. Thirty-one patient resources (18 leaflets and 13 online) were assessed against quality criteria. The aim of the resource was seldom explicit, the content was often incomplete and variation in readability scores indicated high levels of literacy were required. DISCUSSION: Access to, and quality of, patient information for hypodontia is inadequate. Current resources are not sufficiently comprehensive to prepare young patients to engage in shared dental care decisions with their parents and/or dental professionals.

conclusionThere is a need for improved access to, and provision of, information about hypodontia if dental professionals want to meet best practice guidance and involve patients in shared decision-making.

Identifiers

PMID29607094
PMCPMC5844244
OpenAlexW2792984422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.