ArticleEcology and evolution2018
Epigenetic population differentiation in field- and common garden-grown
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drivers of Intraspecific Trait Variation and Drought Response of a Dominant US Great Plains Grass: Disentangling the Role of Climate and Genetic Background.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Revealing the transitory and local effect of zebularine on development and on proteome dynamics ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Exploring the crop epigenome: a comparison of DNA methylation profiling techniques.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- DNA Methylation Correlates With Responses of ExperimentalFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Epigenetic variation: A major player in facilitating plant fitness under changing environmental conditions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Low genome-wide divergence between two lizard populations with high adaptive phenotypic differentiation.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Local parasite pressures and host genotype modulate epigenetic diversity in a mixed-mating fish.Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
- Local adaptation through genetic differentiation in highly fragmentedEcology and evolution · 2018Article
- Epigenetic population differentiation in field- and common garden-grownEcology and evolution · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Populations often differ in phenotype and these differences can be caused by adaptation by natural selection, random neutral processes, and environmental responses. The most straightforward way to divide mechanisms that influence phenotypic variation is heritable variation and environmental-induced variation (e.g., plasticity). While genetic variation is responsible for most heritable phenotypic variation, part of this is also caused by nongenetic inheritance. Epigenetic processes may be one of the underlying mechanisms of plasticity and nongenetic inheritance and can therefore possibly contribute to heritable differences through drift and selection. Epigenetic variation may be influenced directly by the environment, and part of this variation can be transmitted to next generations. Field screenings combined with common garden experiments will add valuable insights into epigenetic differentiation, epigenetic memory and can help to reveal part of the relative importance of epigenetics in explaining trait variation. We explored both genetic and epigenetic diversity, structure and differentiation in the field and a common garden for five British and five French
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.