Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29606507›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2018

Human ISL1

Kylie S Foo, Miia L Lehtinen, Chuen Yan Leung, Xiaojun Lian, Jiejia Xu, Wendy Keung, Lin Geng, Terje R S Kolstad, Sebastian Thams, Andy On-Tik Wong and 10 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Recapitulating porcine cardiac developmentFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Kylie S FooDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Miia L LehtinenDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Chuen Yan LeungDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Xiaojun LianDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Jiejia XuDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Wendy KeungStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Consortium, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Dr. Li Dak-Sum Research Centre, University of Hong Kong-Karolinska Institutet Collaborations in Regenerative Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Lin GengStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Consortium, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Dr. Li Dak-Sum Research Centre, University of Hong Kong-Karolinska Institutet Collaborations in Regenerative Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Terje R S KolstadInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Sebastian ThamsDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andy On-Tik WongStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Consortium, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Nicodemus WongStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Consortium, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Dr. Li Dak-Sum Research Centre, University of Hong Kong-Karolinska Institutet Collaborations in Regenerative Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Kristine BylundDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Chikai ZhouDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Xiaobing HeDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Shao-Bo JinDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Jonathan ClarkeDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Urban LendahlDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Ronald A LiStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Consortium, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Dr. Li Dak-Sum Research Centre, University of Hong Kong-Karolinska Institutet Collaborations in Regenerative Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Ming Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine-Karolinska Institutet, Hong Kong, China.
William E LouchInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kenneth R ChienDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden. Electronic address: kenneth.chien@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generation of human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived ventricular progenitors and their assembly into a 3-dimensional in vivo functional ventricular heart patch has remained an elusive goal. Herein, we report the generation of an enriched pool of hPSC-derived ventricular progenitors (HVPs), which can expand, differentiate, self-assemble, and mature into a functional ventricular patch in vivo without the aid of any gel or matrix. We documented a specific temporal window, in which the HVPs will engraft in vivo. On day 6 of differentiation, HVPs were enriched by depleting cells positive for pluripotency marker TRA-1-60 with magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS), and 3 million sorted cells were sub-capsularly transplanted onto kidneys of NSG mice where, after 2 months, they formed a 7 mm × 3 mm × 4 mm myocardial patch resembling the ventricular wall. The graft acquired several features of maturation: expression of ventricular marker (MLC2v), desmosomes, appearance of T-tubule-like structures, and electrophysiological action potential signature consistent with maturation, all this in a non-cardiac environment. We further demonstrated that HVPs transplanted into un-injured hearts of NSG mice remain viable for up to 8 months. Moreover, transplantation of 2 million HVPs largely preserved myocardial contractile function following myocardial infarction. Taken together, our study reaffirms the promising idea of using progenitor cells for regenerative therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCell SeparationHeart VentriclesHumansLIM-Homeodomain ProteinsMaleMiceMice, Inbred NODMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacPluripotent Stem CellsTranscription Factorsinsulin gene enhancer binding protein Isl-1LIM-Homeodomain ProteinsTranscription Factorscardiac regenerationdifferentiationhumanmyocardial infarctionstem cellventricular progenitor

Identifiers

PMID29606507
PMCPMC6035340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.