Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29606141›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

'Researchers have love for life': opportunities and barriers to engage pregnant women in malaria research in post-Ebola Liberia.

Guillermo Martínez Pérez, Christine K Tarr-Attia, Bondey Breeze-Barry, Adelaida Sarukhan, Dawoh Peter Lansana, Ana Meyer García-Sípido, Anna Rosés, María Maixenchs, Quique Bassat, Alfredo Mayor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Guillermo Martínez PérezISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. gmartinezgabas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6756-9515
Christine K Tarr-AttiaSaint Joseph's Catholic Hospital, Tubman Boulevard, Oldest Congo Town, PO Box 10-512, 1100, Monrovia, Liberia.
Bondey Breeze-BarrySaint Joseph's Catholic Hospital, Tubman Boulevard, Oldest Congo Town, PO Box 10-512, 1100, Monrovia, Liberia.
Adelaida SarukhanISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Dawoh Peter LansanaSaint Joseph's Catholic Hospital, Tubman Boulevard, Oldest Congo Town, PO Box 10-512, 1100, Monrovia, Liberia.
Ana Meyer García-SípidoNGO Juan Ciudad Foundation, Madrid, Spain.
Anna RosésISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
María MaixenchsISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Quique BassatISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alfredo MayorISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Barcelona Institute for Global Health · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESManhiça Health Research Centre · MZSt. Joseph Hospital · US

Funding

European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership EDCTP CSA-Ebola-334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdoption of prevention and therapeutic innovations to ensure that National Malaria Control Programmes meet their incidence reduction targets is highly dependent on the conduct of rigorous clinical trials. In Liberia, malaria control virtually halted during the recent Ebola epidemic, and could enormously benefit from innovations to protect its most vulnerable populations, including pregnant women, against malaria. Health policy-planners could feel more inclined to adopt novel interventions with demonstrated safety and efficacy when trialled among their women population. However, pregnant women are especially vulnerable when targeted as research participants. Whilst some studies in the region attempted to understand the ethical issues around the conduct of clinical research, there is need of such information from Liberia to inform future malaria research.

methodsThis is a grounded theory study that aims to understand the barriers and opportunities for pregnant women to consent to participate in malaria research in Liberia. The study was conducted between November 2016 and May 2017 at the St Joseph's Catholic Hospital, Monrovia. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were held with hospital staff, traditional community representatives, and pregnant women.

resultsAccording to the participants, useful strategies to motivate pregnant women to consent to participate in malaria research could be providing evidence-based education on malaria and research to the general population and encouraging engagement of traditional leaders in research design and community mobilization. Fears and suspicions towards research and researchers, which were amplified during the conduct of Ebola vaccine and drug clinical trials, may influence women's acceptance and willingness to engage in malaria research. Population's mistrust in the public healthcare system might hinder their acceptance of research, undermining the probability of their benefiting from any improved malaria control intervention.

conclusionBenchmarking for acceptable practices from previous public health interventions; building community discussion and dissemination platforms; and mapping communication and information errors from how previous research interventions were explained to the Liberian population, are strategies that might help ensure a safe and fully informed participation of pregnant women in malaria research. Inequity issues impeding access and use of biomedical care for women must be tackled urgently.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPregnant PeopleAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansLiberiaMalariaPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousQualitative ResearchAccess to healthcareLiberiaMalariaPregnant womenPreventionQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID29606141
PMCPMC5880008
OpenAlexW2804169321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.