Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29605877›Full record

ReviewPituitary2018

How are growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 reported as markers for drug effectiveness in clinical acromegaly research? A comprehensive methodologic review.

Michiel J van Esdonk, Eline J M van Zutphen, Ferdinand Roelfsema, Alberto M Pereira, Piet H van der Graaf, Nienke R Biermasz, Jasper Stevens, Jacobus Burggraaf

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The power of modelling pulsatile profiles.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pegvisomant in acromegaly: a multicenter real-life study in Argentina.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2019
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michiel J van EsdonkDivision of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. M.j.van.esdonk@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8159-0273
Eline J M van ZutphenDivision of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8364-3620
Ferdinand RoelfsemaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alberto M PereiraDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Piet H van der GraafDivision of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-3484
Nienke R BiermaszDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5817-3594
Jasper StevensDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1601-9008
Jacobus BurggraafDivision of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn rare disease research, most randomized prospective clinical trials can only use limited number of patients and are comprised of highly heterogeneous populations. Therefore, it is crucial to report the results in such a manner that it allows for comparison of treatment effectiveness and biochemical control between studies. The aim of this review was to investigate the current methods that are being applied to measure and report growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) as markers for drug effectiveness in clinical acromegaly research. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic search of recent prospective and retrospective studies, published between 2012 and 2017, that studied the effects of somatostatin analogues or dopamine agonists in acromegaly patients was performed. The markers of interest were GH, IGF-1, and the suppression of GH after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Additionally, the use of pharmacokinetic (PK) measurements in these studies was analyzed. The sampling design, cut-off for biochemical control, reported units, and used summary statistics were summarized.

resultsA total of 49 articles were selected out of the 263 screened abstracts. IGF-1 concentrations were measured in all 49 studies, GH in 45 studies, and an OGTT was performed in 11 studies. A wide range of different cut-off values and sampling designs were used to determine biochemical control in acromegaly patients. The summary statistics were reported in various ways, with the percentage of biochemical control most frequently used. Nine studies sampled the PK at one or more time points. Non-compartmental analyses were commonly performed on the available PK data.

conclusionsThe way GH and IGF-1 are measured and reported in acromegaly research varies considerably. A consensus on how to report study results would enable better comparisons between studies, thereby improving evidence based decision making to optimize treatment in acromegaly.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAnimalsGlucose Tolerance TestGrowth HormoneHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IPituitary NeoplasmsGrowth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor IAcromegalyGrowth hormoneIGF-1—reviewPituitary adenoma

Identifiers

PMID29605877
PMCPMC5942341
OpenAlexW2795001335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.