ArticleRheumatology and therapy2018
Secukinumab Versus Adalimumab for Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparative Effectiveness up to 48 Weeks Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.
Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of therapies for psoriatic arthritis on patient-reported outcomes.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: updates to a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: results from systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of enzalutamide versus darolutamide doublet in mHSPC.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Trial
- A head-to-head comparison of the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in biological-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a randomised, open-label, blinded-assessor trial.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2020Trial
- Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of enzalutamide versus apalutamide with androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Persistence and Long-Term Disease Control of Interleukin-17 Inhibitors and Interleukin-23 Inhibitors in Patients with Psoriasis: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Risankizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.Rheumatology and therapy · 2024Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Ustekinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.Rheumatology and therapy · 2024Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.Rheumatology and therapy · 2024Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Secukinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.Rheumatology and therapy · 2024Article
- Treatment persistence of biologics among patients with psoriatic arthritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2021Article
- Applying precision medicine to unmet clinical needs in psoriatic disease.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2020Review
- TYK2 inhibition reduces type 3 immunity and modifies disease progression in murine spondyloarthritis.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2020Article
- Article
- Comparative effectiveness of secukinumab and etanercept in biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis assessed by matching-adjusted indirect comparison.European journal of rheumatology · 2019Article
- Optimal Biologic Selection for Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: the Approach to Precision Medicine.Current rheumatology reports · 2019Review
- Mini Review: New Treatments in Psoriatic Arthritis. Focus on the IL-23/17 Axis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Review
- Position Statement on Secukinumab in the Management of Plaque Psoriasis: The Malaysian Perspective.Dermatology research and practice · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSecukinumab and adalimumab are approved for adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In the absence of direct randomized controlled trial (RCT) data, matching-adjusted indirect comparison can estimate the comparative effectiveness in anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-naïve populations.
methodsIndividual patient data from the FUTURE 2 RCT (secukinumab vs. placebo; N = 299) were adjusted to match baseline characteristics of the ADEPT RCT (adalimumab vs. placebo; N = 313). Logistic regression determined adjustment weights for age, body weight, sex, race, methotrexate use, psoriasis affecting ≥ 3% of body surface area, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index score, presence of dactylitis and enthesitis, and previous anti-TNF therapy. Recalculated secukinumab outcomes were compared with adalimumab outcomes at weeks 12 (placebo-adjusted), 16, 24, and 48 (nonplacebo-adjusted).
resultsAfter matching, the effective sample size for FUTURE 2 was 101. Week 12 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates were not significantly different between secukinumab and adalimumab. Week 16 ACR 20 and 50 response rates were higher for secukinumab 150 mg than for adalimumab (P = 0.017, P = 0.033), as was ACR 50 for secukinumab 300 mg (P = 0.030). Week 24 ACR 20 and 50 were higher for secukinumab 150 mg than for adalimumab (P = 0.001, P = 0.019), as was ACR 20 for secukinumab 300 mg (P = 0.048). Week 48 ACR 20 was higher for secukinumab 150 and 300 mg than for adalimumab (P = 0.002, P = 0.027), as was ACR 50 for secukinumab 300 mg (P = 0.032).
conclusionsIn our analysis, patients with PsA receiving secukinumab were more likely to achieve higher ACR responses through 1 year (weeks 16-48) than those treated with adalimumab. Although informative, these observations rely on a subgroup of patients from FUTURE 2 and thus should be considered interim until the ongoing head-to-head RCT EXCEED can validate these findings.
fundingNovartis Pharma AG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.