Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29605819›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Effect of personalised citizen assistance for social participation (APIC) on older adults' health and social participation: study protocol for a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Mélanie Levasseur, Marie-France Dubois, Johanne Filliatrault, Helen-Maria Vasiliadis, Joanie Lacasse-Bédard, André Tourigny, Marie-Josée Levert, Catherine Gabaude, Hélène Lefebvre, Valérie Berger and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03161860 (Effect of Personalised Citizen Assistance for Social Participation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03161860 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Effect of Personalised Citizen Assistance for Social Participation (APIC) on Older Adults' Health and Social Participation: a Pragmatic Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMélanie LevasseurRan2017 to 2025Enrolled180ConditionsCommunity-dwelling Older AdultsArmsPersonalised citizen assistance for social participation(APIC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mélanie LevasseurResearch Centre on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) de l'Estrie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Marie-France DuboisResearch Centre on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) de l'Estrie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Johanne FilliatraultResearch Centre, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montreal (CRIUGM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Helen-Maria VasiliadisResearch Centre, Charles-Le Moyne Hospital, Université de Sherbrooke Longueuil Campus, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada.
Joanie Lacasse-BédardResearch Centre on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) de l'Estrie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
André TourignyDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Josée LevertCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Catherine GabaudeFrench Institute of Transport, Development and Network Science and Technology (IFSTTAR), Marne-la-Vallée, France.
Hélène LefebvreCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Valérie BergerHospital University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Chantal EymardAix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Funding

CIHR 148466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe challenges of global ageing and the growing burden of chronic diseases require innovative interventions acting on health determinants like social participation. Many older adults do not have equitable opportunities to achieve full social participation, and interventions might underempower their personal and environmental resources and only reach a minority. To optimise current practices, the METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic multicentre, prospective, two-armed, randomised controlled trial will evaluate: (1) the short-term and long-term effects of the APIC on older adults' health, social participation, life satisfaction and healthcare services utilisation and (2) its cost-effectiveness. A total of 376 participants restricted in at least one instrumental activity of daily living and living in three large cities in the province of Quebec, Canada, will be randomly assigned to the experimental or control group using a centralised computer-generated random number sequence procedure. The experimental group will receive weekly 3-hour personalised stimulation sessions given by a trained volunteer over the first 12 months. Sessions will encourage empowerment, gradual mobilisation of personal and environmental resources and community integration. The control group will receive the publicly funded universal healthcare services available to all Quebecers. Over 2 years (baseline and 12, 18 and 24 months later), self-administered questionnaires will assess physical and mental health (primary outcome; version 2 of the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, converted to SF-6D utility scores for quality-adjusted life years), social participation (Social Participation Scale) and life satisfaction (Life Satisfaction Index-Z). Healthcare services utilisation will be recorded and costs of each intervention calculated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Research Ethics Committee of the TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03161860; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseQuality of LifeSocial ParticipationAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHumansPersonal SatisfactionProspective StudiesQuebecResearch DesignUrban Populationcommunity participationcost-effectivenessempowermentintervention evaluationsocial activitysocial integration

Identifiers

PMID29605819
PMCPMC5884338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.