ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2018
Speech-material and talker effects in speech band importance.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- English band importance functions in competing speech for Spanish-speaking second-language learners of English.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- Serial Recall Predicts Vocoded Sentence Recognition Across Spectral Resolutions.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- The effect of speech material on the band importance function for Mandarin Chinese.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Individualized frequency importance functions for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Are there sex effects for speech intelligibility in American English? Examining the influence of talker, listener, and methodology.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2019Article
- The noise susceptibility of various speech bands.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Band-importance functions created using the compound method [Apoux and Healy (2012). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 1078-1087] provide more detail than those generated using the ANSI technique, necessitating and allowing a re-examination of the influences of speech material and talker on the shape of the band-importance function. More specifically, the detailed functions may reflect, to a larger extent, acoustic idiosyncrasies of the individual talker's voice. Twenty-one band functions were created using standard speech materials and recordings by different talkers. The band-importance functions representing the same speech-material type produced by different talkers were found to be more similar to one another than functions representing the same talker producing different speech-material types. Thus, the primary finding was the relative strength of a speech-material effect and weakness of a talker effect. This speech-material effect extended to other materials in the same broad class (different sentence corpora) despite considerable differences in the specific materials. Characteristics of individual talkers' voices were not readily apparent in the functions, and the talker effect was restricted to more global aspects of talker (i.e., gender). Finally, the use of multiple talkers diminished any residual effect of the talker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.