Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29604453›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Bayesian uncertainty quantification in linear models for diffusion MRI.

Jens Sjölund, Anders Eklund, Evren Özarslan, Magnus Herberthson, Maria Bånkestad, Hans Knutsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Denoising diffusion MRI: Considerations and implications for analysis.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jens SjölundElekta Instrument AB, Kungstensgatan 18, Box 7593, SE-103 93, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Sweden. Electronic address: jens.sjolund@elekta.com.
Anders EklundDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Sweden; Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Evren ÖzarslanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Sweden.
Magnus HerberthsonDepartment of Mathematics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria BånkestadRISE SICS, Isafjordsgatan 22, Box 1263, SE-164 29, Kista, Sweden.
Hans KnutssonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Sweden.

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015902 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI PUJOL, SONIA · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Image Guided Therapy Center - Ultrasound-based sensor system for the monitoring of COVID-19 patientsP41EB015898 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TEMPANY, CLARE M · 2012 to 2021
$18.9M
Novel DT-MRI Analyses of White Matter in SchizophreniaR01MH074794 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WESTIN, CARL-FREDRIK · 2007 to 2021
$9.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015898NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015902NIH HHS P41EB015898NIH HHS P41EB015902NIH HHS R01MH074794NIH HHS U01-MH93765NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is a valuable tool in the assessment of tissue microstructure. By fitting a model to the dMRI signal it is possible to derive various quantitative features. Several of the most popular dMRI signal models are expansions in an appropriately chosen basis, where the coefficients are determined using some variation of least-squares. However, such approaches lack any notion of uncertainty, which could be valuable in e.g. group analyses. In this work, we use a probabilistic interpretation of linear least-squares methods to recast popular dMRI models as Bayesian ones. This makes it possible to quantify the uncertainty of any derived quantity. In particular, for quantities that are affine functions of the coefficients, the posterior distribution can be expressed in closed-form. We simulated measurements from single- and double-tensor models where the correct values of several quantities are known, to validate that the theoretically derived quantiles agree with those observed empirically. We included results from residual bootstrap for comparison and found good agreement. The validation employed several different models: Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), Mean Apparent Propagator MRI (MAP-MRI) and Constrained Spherical Deconvolution (CSD). We also used in vivo data to visualize maps of quantitative features and corresponding uncertainties, and to show how our approach can be used in a group analysis to downweight subjects with high uncertainty. In summary, we convert successful linear models for dMRI signal estimation to probabilistic models, capable of accurate uncertainty quantification.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalModels, TheoreticalBayes TheoremBrainComputer SimulationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansLinear ModelsUncertaintyDiffusion MRISignal estimationUncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID29604453
PMCPMC6419970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.