Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29604092›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2018

Prognostic relevance of subclinical coronary and carotid atherosclerosis in a diabetic and nondiabetic asymptomatic population.

Andrea Igoren Guaricci, Valentina Lorenzoni, Marco Guglielmo, Saima Mushtaq, Giuseppe Muscogiuri, Filippo Cademartiri, Mark Rabbat, Daniele Andreini, Gaetano Serviddio, Nicola Gaibazzi and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea Igoren GuaricciInstitute of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University Hospital Policlinico, Bari, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7133-4401
Valentina LorenzoniInstitute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Marco GuglielmoCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Saima MushtaqCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe MuscogiuriCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Filippo CademartiriSDN, IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
Mark RabbatCenter for Heart and Vascular Medicine, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Daniele AndreiniCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Gaetano ServiddioDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Nicola GaibazziDepartment of Cardiology, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Mauro PepiCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca PontoneCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1339-6679
Centro Cardiologico Monzino · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITLoyola University Chicago · USScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITSDN Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought to evaluate the incremental prognostic benefit of carotid artery disease and subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD) features in addition to clinical evaluation in an asymptomatic population.

methodsOver a 6-year period, 10-year Framingham risk score together with carotid ultrasound and coronary computed tomography angiography were evaluated for prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

resultsWe enrolled 517 consecutive asymptomatic patients (63% male, mean age 64 ±10 years; 17.6% with diabetes). Median (interquartile range) coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was 34 (0-100). Over a median follow-up of 4.4 (3.4-5.1) years, there were 53 MACE (10%). Patients experiencing MACE had higher CACS, incidence of carotid disease, presence of CAD ≥50%, and remodeled plaque as compared with patients without MACE. At multivariable analyses, presence of CAD ≥50% (HR: 5.14, 95% CI: 2.1-12.4) and percentage of segments with remodeled plaque (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03-1.06) independently predicted MACE (P < 0.001). Models adding CAD ≥50% or percentage of segments with remodeled plaque resulted in higher discrimination and reclassification ability compared with a model based on 10-year FRS, carotid disease, and CACS. Specifically, the C-statistic improved to 0.75 with addition of CAD and 0.84 when adding percentage of segments with remodeled plaque, whereas net reclassification improvement indices were 0.86 and 0.92, respectively.

conclusionsIn an asymptomatic population, CAD and plaque positive remodeling increase MACE prediction compared with a model based on 10-year FRS, carotid disease, and CACS estimation. In the diabetes subgroup, percentage of segments with remodeled plaque was the only predictor of MACE.

Indexed as

AgedAsymptomatic DiseasesCarotid Artery DiseasesCarotid Intima-Media ThicknessChi-Square DistributionComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansIncidenceItalyMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyCalcium ScoringCardiovascular PreventionCarotid DiseaseComputed TomographyCoronary Artery DiseaseDiabetes MellitusSubclinical Atherosclerosis

Identifiers

PMID29604092
PMCPMC6489820
OpenAlexW2795132025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.