Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29603277›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2018

CALIPER: A deformable image registration algorithm for large geometric changes during radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Christopher L Guy, Elisabeth Weiss, Gary E Christensen, Nuzhat Jan, Geoffrey D Hugo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher L GuyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Elisabeth WeissDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Gary E ChristensenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Nuzhat JanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Geoffrey D HugoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USUniversity of Iowa · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Mark E Burkard · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Consistent anatomy registration for lung cancer adaptive radiation therapyR01CA166119 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HUGO, GEOFFREY D · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLocally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients may experience dramatic changes in anatomy during radiotherapy and could benefit from adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Deformable image registration (DIR) is necessary to accurately accumulate dose during plan adaptation, but current algorithms perform poorly in the presence of large geometric changes, namely atelectasis resolution. The goal of this work was to develop a DIR framework, named Consistent Anatomy in Lung Parametric imagE Registration (CALIPER), to handle large geometric changes in the thorax.

methodsRegistrations were performed on pairs of baseline and mid-treatment CT datasets of NSCLC patients presenting with atelectasis at the start of treatment. Pairs were classified based on atelectasis volume change as either full, partial, or no resolution. The evaluated registration algorithms consisted of several combinations of a hybrid intensity- and feature-based similarity cost function to investigate the ability to simultaneously match healthy lung parenchyma and adjacent atelectasis. These components of the cost function included a mass-preserving intensity cost in the lung parenchyma, use of filters to enhance vascular structures in the lung parenchyma, manually delineated lung lobes as labels, and several intensity cost functions to model atelectasis change. Registration error was quantified with landmark-based target registration error and post-registration alignment of atelectatic lobes.

resultsThe registrations using both lobe labels and vasculature enhancement in addition to intensity of the CT images were found to have the highest accuracy. Of these registrations, the mean (SD) of mean landmark error across patients was 2.50 (1.16) mm, 2.80 (0.70) mm, and 2.04 (0.13) mm for no change, partial resolution, and full atelectasis resolution, respectively. The mean (SD) atelectatic lobe Dice similarity coefficient was 0.91 (0.08), 0.90 (0.08), and 0.89 (0.04), respectively, for the same groups. Registration accuracy was comparable to healthy lung registrations of current state-of-the-art algorithms reported in literature.

conclusionsThe CALIPER algorithm developed in this work achieves accurate image registration for challenging cases involving large geometric and topological changes in NSCLC patients, a requirement for enabling ART in this patient group.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansLungLung NeoplasmsPulmonary AtelectasisRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedThoraxTomography, X-Ray Computedatelectasisdeformable image registrationdeformationlungregistration

Identifiers

PMID29603277
PMCPMC5997537
OpenAlexW2794450545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.