ArticleMedical physics2018
CALIPER: A deformable image registration algorithm for large geometric changes during radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deformable Image Registration Uncertainty-Encompassing Dose Accumulation for Adaptive Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Article
- CT-augmented digital tomosynthesis image reconstruction in image-guided bronchoscopy interventions.Medical physics · 2025Article
- A novel evaluation model of image registration for cone-beam computed tomography guided lung cancer radiotherapy.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-based automated segmentation and radiotherapy dose mapping for thoracic normal tissues.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Robust Measures of Image-Registration-Derived Lung Biomechanics in SPIROMICS.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
- PLOSL: Population learning followed by one shot learning pulmonary image registration using tissue volume preserving and vesselness constraints.Medical image analysis · 2022Article
- The dose accumulation and the impact of deformable image registration on dose reporting parameters in a moving patient undergoing proton radiotherapy.Radiology and oncology · 2022Article
- A multichannel feature-based approach for longitudinal lung CT registration in the presence of radiation induced lung damage.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Adaptive Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Lung Cancer: An Overview of the Current State of the Field.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Image-guidance triggered adaptive replanning of radiation therapy for locally advanced lung cancer: an evaluation of cases requiring plan adaptation.The British journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Practical Clinical Workflows for Online and Offline Adaptive Radiation Therapy.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2019Article
- Technical Note: A method for quality assurance of landmark sets for use in evaluation of deformable image registration accuracy of lung parenchyma.Medical physics · 2019Article
- Evaluation of Image Registration Accuracy for Tumor and Organs at Risk in the Thorax for Compliance With TG 132 Recommendations.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
- Rigid and Deformable Image Registration for Radiation Therapy: A Self-Study Evaluation Guide for NRG Oncology Clinical Trial Participation.Practical radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLocally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients may experience dramatic changes in anatomy during radiotherapy and could benefit from adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Deformable image registration (DIR) is necessary to accurately accumulate dose during plan adaptation, but current algorithms perform poorly in the presence of large geometric changes, namely atelectasis resolution. The goal of this work was to develop a DIR framework, named Consistent Anatomy in Lung Parametric imagE Registration (CALIPER), to handle large geometric changes in the thorax.
methodsRegistrations were performed on pairs of baseline and mid-treatment CT datasets of NSCLC patients presenting with atelectasis at the start of treatment. Pairs were classified based on atelectasis volume change as either full, partial, or no resolution. The evaluated registration algorithms consisted of several combinations of a hybrid intensity- and feature-based similarity cost function to investigate the ability to simultaneously match healthy lung parenchyma and adjacent atelectasis. These components of the cost function included a mass-preserving intensity cost in the lung parenchyma, use of filters to enhance vascular structures in the lung parenchyma, manually delineated lung lobes as labels, and several intensity cost functions to model atelectasis change. Registration error was quantified with landmark-based target registration error and post-registration alignment of atelectatic lobes.
resultsThe registrations using both lobe labels and vasculature enhancement in addition to intensity of the CT images were found to have the highest accuracy. Of these registrations, the mean (SD) of mean landmark error across patients was 2.50 (1.16) mm, 2.80 (0.70) mm, and 2.04 (0.13) mm for no change, partial resolution, and full atelectasis resolution, respectively. The mean (SD) atelectatic lobe Dice similarity coefficient was 0.91 (0.08), 0.90 (0.08), and 0.89 (0.04), respectively, for the same groups. Registration accuracy was comparable to healthy lung registrations of current state-of-the-art algorithms reported in literature.
conclusionsThe CALIPER algorithm developed in this work achieves accurate image registration for challenging cases involving large geometric and topological changes in NSCLC patients, a requirement for enabling ART in this patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.