Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29603075›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2018

Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening in Foreign-Born Chinese-American Women: Does Racial/Ethnic and Language Concordance Matter?

Karen Kim, Michal Quinn, Helen Lam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hospital-based gastric cancer outcomes in the United States (2003-2022): racial and regional disparities.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen KimThe University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, 5841 South Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Michal QuinnDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 South Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Helen LamThe University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, 5841 South Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. hvallina@bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3369-8658
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chinese Americans are one of the fastest-growing and largest Asian-American subgroups. Approximately 70% of Chinese Americans are immigrants with 46% being of limited English proficiency. Despite colorectal cancer (CRC) being the second leading cause of cancer death in Chinese Americans, Chinese Americans have lower CRC screening rates than other Asian subgroups, and only 40% of CRC cases among Chinese Americans are diagnosed early. Furthermore, CRC is the second most common cancer among Chinese American women. Race/ethnicity concordant providers may process culturally specific knowledge, skills, and experience that may facilitate better communication. Although using an interpreter can help to overcome language barriers between providers and patients, it may not achieve the same level of communication as a language concordant provider. The purpose of this study was to test a community education intervention, taking into account the racial/ethnic and language concordance of the presenter, to increase CRC screening uptake among foreign-born Chinese American women. This study used a quasi-experimental design and a convenience sample of 198 foreign-born Chinese-American women. Logistic regression was used to examine the effect of racial/ethnic and language concordance of the presenter on the return of completed FOBT kits for testing. The Chinese/English-speaking presenter had the highest return rate (73%), followed by the White/English-speaking presenter (61%), and the Chinese/Chinese-speaking presenter (48%), and the differences were statistically significant. Post-education intention to screen was also a significant predictor for returning the FOBT kit for testing. The use of an interpreter did not decrease the effectiveness of the educational intervention.

Indexed as

AsianCommunication BarriersEmigrants and ImmigrantsIntentionAgedColorectal NeoplasmsCommunicationEarly Detection of CancerEthnicityFemaleHealth EducationHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedOccult BloodAsian AmericansColorectal cancer screeningCommunity educationLanguage concordanceRacial/ethnic concordance

Identifiers

PMID29603075
OpenAlexW2794711852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.