Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29603053›Full record

ReviewJournal of community health2018

Policy Implications and Research Recommendations: A Review of Hookah Use Among US College Students.

Bradley Fevrier, Rebecca A Vidourek, Pauline Privitera

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of community health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bradley FevrierHealth and Human Performance Program, UNC-Pembroke, 1 University Drive, PO Box 1510, Pembroke, NC, 28372, USA. Bradley.fevrieby@uncp.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9826-9021
Rebecca A VidourekHealth Promotion & Education, University of Cincinnati, 460NA TEACHER-DYER, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0068, USA.
Pauline PriviteraHealth and Human Performance Program, UNC-Pembroke, 1 University Drive, PO Box 1510, Pembroke, NC, 28372, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rate of Hookah use among college students during the last decade is about 30%. Although college students perceive hookah use as a safer alternative to conventional cigarettes, hookah use increases the risk of disease and nicotine dependence, and therefore remains an area of concern. Presently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has little regulation for the manufacture, distribution, or sale of hookah. This review attempts to assess empirical literature relating to hookah use while focusing on the consequences for regulatory policy. PubMed (including MEDLINE 2010-2017), PsycINFO, EBSCO, Scopus (Elsevier) databases were examined to pinpoint articles published in English. The following terms were used in the searches: Hookah or Waterpipe or nargile or "arghile" or "shisha" or "hubble bubble" or "alternative tobacco product" or "flavored tobacco". Hookah use may initiate smoking among tobacconaïve college students. College students who use hookah are generally not aware of the increased risks for tobacco related diseases as it relates to their behavior. In addition, few public health messages target college-age adults with anti-hookah messages. A lack of information regarding the dangers and potential harms of hookah use may be misinterpreted as a sign of "safety" which inadvertently may imply a suggestion of no need for safety measures. Hence, a research agenda that would inform about health policy actions has been proposed.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAdultFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupSmokingSmoking Water PipesStudentsTobacco, SmokelessTobacco Use DisorderUniversitiesYoung AdultCo-occurring substance useHookahHookah and other drug useMarijuanaShishaWaterpipe

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.