Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29603042›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2018

A transvaginal approach to rectovaginal fistulae for the colorectal surgeon: technical notes and case series.

R Bhome, A Monga, K P Nugent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R BhomeDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7143-4939
A MongaDepartment of Gynaecology, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Princess Ann Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. ash.monga@uhs.nhs.uk.
K P NugentDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. k.p.nugent@soton.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20526Cancer Research UK A20526Medical Research Council MR/R002061/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectovaginal fistulae (RVF) are not uncommonly seen by the colorectal surgeon and gynaecologist, often debilitating for patients and typically managed with multiple operative procedures, achieving control rather than cure. Transvaginal repair is the least common surgical approach but has clear advantages and equivalent healing rates to other approaches. Here, we describe a simple, safe and effective flapless transvaginal technique for the repair of primary and recurrent low- and mid-level RVF of varying aetiology. We report 15 cases of RVF (nine recurrent) treated by this technique at a single UK centre. The healing rate was 67%. There were no major complications. Median follow-up was 48 months.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColorectal SurgeryFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRectovaginal FistulaSurgeonsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomVaginaProcedureRectovaginal fistulaRepairTechniqueTransvaginal

Identifiers

PMID29603042
PMCPMC5954075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.