ArticlePharmaceutical research2018
Effect of Chemical Binding of Doxorubicin Hydrochloride to Gold Nanoparticles, Versus Electrostatic Adsorption, on the In Vitro Drug Release and Cytotoxicity to Breast Cancer Cells.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancements in Drug Delivery Systems in Glioblastoma Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Synthesis and toxicity assessment ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Low-frequency magnetic fields potentiate plasma-modified magneto-electric nanoparticle drug loading for anticancer activity in vitro and in vivo.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Convenient and Controllable Synthesis of Poly(2-oxazoline)-Conjugated Doxorubicin for Regulating Anti-Tumor Selectivity.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Green Metallic Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Evaluation Models and Cancer Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe selective delivery of chemotherapeutic agent to the affected area is mainly dependent on the mode of drug loading within the delivery system. This study aims to compare the physical method to the chemical method on the efficiency of loading DOX.HCl to GNPs and the specific release of the loaded drug at certain tissue.
methodBifunctional polyethylene glycol with two different functionalities, the alkanethiol and the carboxyl group terminals, was synthesized. Then, DOX·HCl was covalently linked via hydrazone bond, a pH sensitive bond, to the carboxyl functional group and the produced polymer was used to prepare drug functionalized nanoparticles. Another group of GNPs was coated with carboxyl containing polymer; loading the drug into this system by the means of electrostatic adsorption. Finally, the prepared system were characterized with respect to size, shape and drug release in acetate buffer pH 5 and PBS pH 7.4 Also, the effect of DOX.HCl loaded systems on cell viability was assessed using MCF-7 breast cancer cell line.
resultsThe prepared nanoparticles were spherical in shape, small in size and monodisperse. The release rate of the chemically bound drug in the acidic pH was higher than the electrostatically adsorbed one. Moreover, both systems show little release at pH 7.4. Finally, cytotoxicity profiles against human breast adenocarcinoma cell line (MCF-7) exhibited greater cytotoxicity of the chemically bound drug over the electrostatically adsorbed one.
conclusionChemical binding of DOX·HCl to the carboxyl group of PEG coating GNPs selectively delivers high amount of drug to tumour-affected tissue which leads to reducing the unwanted effects of the drug in the non-affected ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.