Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29602865›Full record

ReviewGlobal health, science and practice2018

Family Planning in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Encouraging Momentum, Formidable Challenges.

Dieudonné Kwete, Arsene Binanga, Thibaut Mukaba, Théophile Nemuandjare, Muanda Fidele Mbadu, Marie-Thérèse Kyungu, Perri Sutton, Jane T Bertrand

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global health, science and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Factors Impacting Family Planning Use in Mali and Senegal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Dieudonné KweteGovernment of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Advisor to the Prime Minister, Kinshasa, DRC.
Arsene BinangaTulane International LLC, Kinshasa, DRC.
Thibaut MukabaUnited States Agency for International Development/DRC, Kinshasa, DRC.
Théophile NemuandjareUnited Nations Population Fund, Kinshasa, DRC.
Muanda Fidele MbaduProgramme National de Santé de l'Adolescent, Ministry of Health, Kinshasa, DRC.
Marie-Thérèse KyunguProgramme National la Santé de la Reproduction, Kinshasa, DRC.
Perri SuttonThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jane T BertrandTulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. bertrand@tulane.edu.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USInternational Trachoma Initiative · USMinistère de la Santé · TNPrime Minister's Office · BNTulane University · USUnited States Agency for International Development · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Momentum for family planning in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is evident in multiple ways: strong political will, increasing donor support, a growing number of implementing organizations, innovative family planning programming, and a cohesive family planning stakeholder group. Between 2013 and 2017, the modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR) in the capital city of Kinshasa increased from 18.5% to 26.7% among married women, but as of 2013-14, it was only 7.8% at the national level. The

Indexed as

Democratic Republic of the CongoFamily Planning ServicesHumans

Identifiers

PMID29602865
PMCPMC5878077
OpenAlexW2794870394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.