Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29602362›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in insect science2018

Recent progress and prospects for advancing arachnid genomics.

Jessica E Garb, Prashant P Sharma, Nadia A Ayoub

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in insect science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The genome sequence of an orbweaving spider,Wellcome open research · 2025
    Article
  6. The genome sequence of the furrow orbweaver,Wellcome open research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sex differences in spiders: from phenotype to genomics.Development genes and evolution · 2020
    Review
  18. Gene sequence analysis of toxins from the spiderThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica E GarbDepartment of Biological Sciences, 198 Riverside Street, Olsen Hall 414, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA. Electronic address: Jessica_Garb@uml.edu.
Prashant P SharmaDepartment of Integrative Biology, 352 Birge Hall, 430 Lincoln Drive, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Nadia A AyoubDepartment of Biology, 204 West Washington Street, Howe Hall, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450, USA.
University of Massachusetts Lowell · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWashington and Lee University · US

Funding

Discovering Biomedically Significant Spider Venom Toxins with GenomicsR15GM097714 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI GARB, JESSICA ELLEN · 2011 to 2015
$611k
Convergent Molecular Evolution of Moth and Spider SilksF32GM078875 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI AYOUB, NADIA A · 2007 to 2009
$85k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM078875NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM097714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arachnids exhibit tremendous species richness and adaptations of biomedical, industrial, and agricultural importance. Yet genomic resources for arachnids are limited, with the first few spider and scorpion genomes becoming accessible in the last four years. We review key insights from these genome projects, and recommend additional genomes for sequencing, emphasizing taxa of greatest value to the scientific community. We suggest greater sampling of spiders whose genomes are understudied but hold important protein recipes for silk and venom production. We further recommend arachnid genomes to address significant evolutionary topics, including the phenotypic impact of genome duplications. A barrier to high-quality arachnid genomes are assemblies based solely on short-read data, which may be overcome by long-range sequencing and other emerging methods.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsArachnidaEvolution, MolecularPhylogenySilkSpider VenomsSilkSpider Venoms

Identifiers

PMID29602362
PMCPMC6658092
OpenAlexW2769238156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.