Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29602312›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical semantics2018

Clinical Natural Language Processing in languages other than English: opportunities and challenges.

Aurélie Névéol, Hercules Dalianis, Sumithra Velupillai, Guergana Savova, Pierre Zweigenbaum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Use of unstructured text in prognostic clinical prediction models: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aurélie NévéolLIMSI, CNRS, Université Paris Saclay, Rue John von Neumann, Paris, F-91405 Orsay, France.
Hercules DalianisDSV, Stockholm University, Kista, Sweden.
Sumithra VelupillaiSchool of Computer Science and Communication, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.
Guergana SavovaChildren's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Pierre ZweigenbaumLIMSI, CNRS, Université Paris Saclay, Rue John von Neumann, Paris, F-91405 Orsay, France.

Funding

Temporal relation discovery for clinical textR01LM010090 · NLM · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MARTIN, JAMES H., SAVOVA, GUERGANA K. · 2010 to 2022
$7.1M
Extended Methods and Software Development for Health NLPR01GM114355 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BETHARD, STEVEN, SAVOVA, GUERGANA K. · 2016 to 2024
$5.0M
Cancer Deep Phenotype Extraction from Electronic Medical RecordsU24CA184407 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SAVOVA, GUERGANA K. · 2014 to 2018
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA184407NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114355NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural language processing applied to clinical text or aimed at a clinical outcome has been thriving in recent years. This paper offers the first broad overview of clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP) for languages other than English. Recent studies are summarized to offer insights and outline opportunities in this area. MAIN BODY: We envision three groups of intended readers: (1) NLP researchers leveraging experience gained in other languages, (2) NLP researchers faced with establishing clinical text processing in a language other than English, and (3) clinical informatics researchers and practitioners looking for resources in their languages in order to apply NLP techniques and tools to clinical practice and/or investigation. We review work in clinical NLP in languages other than English. We classify these studies into three groups: (i) studies describing the development of new NLP systems or components de novo, (ii) studies describing the adaptation of NLP architectures developed for English to another language, and (iii) studies focusing on a particular clinical application.

conclusionWe show the advantages and drawbacks of each method, and highlight the appropriate application context. Finally, we identify major challenges and opportunities that will affect the impact of NLP on clinical practice and public health studies in a context that encompasses English as well as other languages.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingHumansSemanticsClinical Decision-MakingLanguages other than EnglishNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID29602312
PMCPMC5877394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.