Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29602255›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2018

Monitoring and control of amygdala neurofeedback involves distributed information processing in the human brain.

Christian Paret, Jenny Zähringer, Matthias Ruf, Martin Fungisai Gerchen, Stephanie Mall, Talma Hendler, Christian Schmahl, Gabriele Ende

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Amygdala self-neuromodulation capacity as a window for process-related network recruitment.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Clinical Application of Real-Time fMRI-Based Neurofeedback for Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian ParetDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9225-7182
Jenny ZähringerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias RufDepartment Neuroimaging, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin Fungisai GerchenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Germany and Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3071-5296
Stephanie MallDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Talma HendlerSagol Center for Brain Function, Wohl Institute for Advanced Imaging, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sagol School of Neuroscience, School of Psychological Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Christian SchmahlDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gabriele EndeDepartment Neuroimaging, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces provide conscious access to neural activity by means of brain-derived feedback ("neurofeedback"). An individual's abilities to monitor and control feedback are two necessary processes for effective neurofeedback therapy, yet their underlying functional neuroanatomy is still being debated. In this study, healthy subjects received visual feedback from their amygdala response to negative pictures. Activation and functional connectivity were analyzed to disentangle the role of brain regions in different processes. Feedback monitoring was mapped to the thalamus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), ventral striatum (VS), and rostral PFC. The VS responded to feedback corresponding to instructions while rPFC activity differentiated between conditions and predicted amygdala regulation. Control involved the lateral PFC, anterior cingulate, and insula. Monitoring and control activity overlapped in the VS and thalamus. Extending current neural models of neurofeedback, this study introduces monitoring and control of feedback as anatomically dissociated processes, and suggests their important role in voluntary neuromodulation.

Indexed as

Self-ControlAdultAmygdalaBrain-Computer InterfacesEmotionsFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurofeedbackPattern Recognition, VisualPrefrontal CortexThalamusVentral StriatumYoung Adultamygdalaemotion regulationneurofeedbackprefrontal cortexreal-time fMRI

Identifiers

PMID29602255
PMCPMC6866431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.