Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29602198›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2018

Severity of olfactory deficits is reflected in functional brain networks-An fMRI study.

Johanna L Reichert, Elbrich M Postma, Paul A M Smeets, Wilbert M Boek, Kees de Graaf, Veronika Schöpf, Sanne Boesveldt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2022
    Review
  5. Functional Connectivity of the Chemosenses: A Review.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Johanna L ReichertInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8955-3271
Elbrich M PostmaDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Paul A M SmeetsDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wilbert M BoekENT Department, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.
Kees de GraafDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Veronika SchöpfInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Sanne BoesveldtDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9560-6093
University of Graz · ATWageningen University & Research · NLZiekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though deficits in olfactory function affect a considerable part of the population, the neuronal basis of olfactory deficits remains scarcely investigated. To achieve a better understanding of how smell loss affects neural activation patterns and functional networks, we set out to investigate patients with olfactory dysfunction using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and olfactory stimulation. We used patients' scores on a standardized olfactory test as continuous measure of olfactory function. 48 patients (mean olfactory threshold discrimination identification (TDI) score = 16.33, SD = 6.4, range 6 - 28.5) were investigated. Overall, patients showed piriform cortex activation during odor stimulation compared to pure sniffing. Group independent component analysis indicated that the recruitment of three networks during odor stimulation was correlated with olfactory function: a sensory processing network (including regions such as insula, thalamus and piriform cortex), a cerebellar network and an occipital network. Interestingly, recruitment of these networks during pure sniffing was related to olfactory function as well. Our results support previous findings that sniffing alone can activate olfactory regions. Extending this, we found that the severity of olfactory deficits is related to the extent to which neural networks are recruited both during olfactory stimulation and pure sniffing. This indicates that olfactory deficits are not only reflected in changes in specific olfactory areas but also in the recruitment of occipital and cerebellar networks. These findings pave the way for future investigations on whether characteristics of these networks might be of use for the prediction of disease prognosis or of treatment success.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOlfaction DisordersOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory PerceptionSeverity of Illness IndexanosmiafMRIfunctional connectivityhyposmianeuronal plasticityolfactionolfactory disorders

Identifiers

PMID29602198
PMCPMC6866458
OpenAlexW2794521713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.