Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29601120›Full record

ArticleCancer science2018

Increased centrosome number in BRCA-related breast cancer specimens determined by immunofluorescence analysis.

Gou Watanabe, Natsuko Chiba, Tadashi Nomizu, Akihiko Furuta, Kaolu Sato, Minoru Miyashita, Hiroshi Tada, Akihiko Suzuki, Noriaki Ohuchi, Takanori Ishida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing the Clinical Relevance ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Emerging treatment approaches for triple-negative breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gou WatanabeDivision of Surgical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-5980
Natsuko ChibaDepartment of Cancer Biology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Tadashi NomizuDepartment of Surgery, Hoshi General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Akihiko FurutaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Ishinomaki Red Cross Hospital, Ishinomaki, Japan.
Kaolu SatoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Ishinomaki Red Cross Hospital, Ishinomaki, Japan.
Minoru MiyashitaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Hiroshi TadaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Akihiko SuzukiTohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan.
Noriaki OhuchiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Takanori IshidaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tohoku University · JPStar General Hospital · JPTohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRCA-related breast carcinoma can be prevented through prophylactic surgery and an intensive follow-up regimen. However, BRCA genetic tests cannot be routinely performed, and some BRCA mutations could not be defined as deleterious mutations or normal variants. Therefore, an easy functional assay of BRCA will be useful to evaluate BRCA status. As it has been reported that BRCA functions in the regulation of centrosome number, we focused on centrosome number in cancer tissues. Here, 70 breast cancer specimens with known BRCA status were analyzed using immunofluorescence of γ-tubulin (a marker of centrosome) foci. The number of foci per cell was higher in cases with BRCA mutation compared to wild-type cases, that is, 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.3) vs 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2-0.8) (P < .001). Specifically, foci numbers per cell in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation cases were 1.2 (95% CI, 0.6-1.8) and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7-2.6), respectively, both higher than those in wild-type cases (P = .042 and P < .0001, respectively). The predictive value of γ-tubulin foci as determined by area under the curve (AUC = 0.86) for BRCA status was superior to BRCAPRO (AUC = 0.69), Myriad Table (AUC = 0.61), and KOHBRA BRCA risk calculator (AUC = 0.65) pretest values. The use of γ-tubulin foci to predict BRCA status had sensitivity = 83% (19/23), specificity = 89% (42/47), and positive predictive value = 77% (20/26). Thus, γ-tubulin immunofluorescence, a functional assessment of BRCA, can be used as a new prospective test of BRCA status.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCentrosomeFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedMutationROC CurveTubulinBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanTubulinBRCA1BRCA2BRCA-related breast cancercentrosomeimmunofluorescence

Identifiers

PMID29601120
PMCPMC5989840
OpenAlexW2795044188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.