Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29600896›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2018

Wavelet decomposition analysis is a clinically relevant strategy to evaluate cerebrovascular buffering of blood pressure after spinal cord injury.

Saqib Saleem, Diana Vucina, Zoe Sarafis, Amanda H X Lee, Jordan W Squair, Otto F Barak, Geoff B Coombs, Tanja Mijacika, Andrei V Krassioukov, Philip N Ainslie and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Network analysis identifies consensus physiological measures of neurovascular coupling in humans.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Trial
  3. Quantification of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: welcome to the jungle!Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Saqib SaleemDepartment of Electrical Engineering, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology , Sahiwal , Pakistan.
Diana VucinaDepartment of Neurology, Clinical Hospital Center Split , Split , Croatia.
Zoe SarafisInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Amanda H X LeeInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jordan W SquairDepartments of Physiology and Pharmacology, Cardiac Sciences, and Clinical Neurosciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Otto F BarakFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Geoff B CoombsCentre for Heart, Lung and Vascular Health, School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan , Kelowna, British Columbia , Canada.
Tanja MijacikaDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Split School of Medicine , Split , Croatia.
Andrei V KrassioukovInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Philip N AinslieCentre for Heart, Lung and Vascular Health, School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan , Kelowna, British Columbia , Canada.
Zeljko DujicDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Split School of Medicine , Split , Croatia.
Yu-Chieh TzengWellington Medical Technology Group, Centre for Translational Physiology, University of Otago , Wellington , New Zealand.
Aaron A PhillipsDepartments of Physiology and Pharmacology, Cardiac Sciences, and Clinical Neurosciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Split · HRCOMSATS University Islamabad · PKUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Novi Sad · RSUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity of the cerebrovasculature to buffer changes in blood pressure (BP) is crucial to prevent stroke, the incidence of which is three- to fourfold elevated after spinal cord injury (SCI). Disruption of descending sympathetic pathways within the spinal cord due to cervical SCI may result in impaired cerebrovascular buffering. Only linear analyses of cerebrovascular buffering of BP, such as transfer function, have been used in SCI research. This approach does not account for inherent nonlinearity and nonstationarity components of cerebrovascular regulation, often depends on perturbations of BP to increase the statistical power, and does not account for the influence of arterial CO

Indexed as

Arterial PressureCerebrovascular CirculationModels, CardiovascularWavelet AnalysisAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultBlood Flow VelocityBrachial ArteryFemaleHomeostasisHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiddle Cerebral ArteryPredictive Value of TestsSpinal Cord Injuriescerebral autoregulationcerebral blood flowcerebral pressure-flow relationshipsparaplegiatetraplegiawavelet decomposition analysis

Identifiers

PMID29600896
PMCPMC6008151
OpenAlexW2795022611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.