ArticleInternational wound journal2018
Serum level of endostatin and digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis patients.
Article in International wound journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endostatin as a biomarker of systemic sclerosis: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Biomarkers reflecting the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and guide therapeutic approach in systemic sclerosis: a narrative review.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Review
- Current Trends in Vascular Biomarkers for Systemic Sclerosis: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The Molecular Mechanisms of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Lung Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Reduction of fat free mass index and phase angle is a risk factor for development digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis patients.Clinical rheumatology · 2020Article
- Serum level of endostatin and digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis patients.International wound journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) are at a high risk of the development of ischaemic digital ulcers (DUs) that can be complicated with infections, gangrene, and osteomyelitis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of endostatin in scleroderma DUs.In total, 90 SSc patients were enrolled in this study. Serum endostatin levels and DU assessment were determined in all SSc patients. The serum levels of endostatin significantly increased with progression of capillaroscopic damage (P < .01). The serum levels of endostatin are significantly (P < .05) higher in SSc patients with new DUs than in SSc patients without new DUs (127 ± 31.1 ng/mL vs 116.3 ± 39.7 ng/mL). The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated good accuracy of new DU prediction for the serum level of endostatin (0.70, P < .01 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.81]). Using a cut-off value of 116 ng/mL, the odds ratio was 2.609 (CI 1.075-6.330, P < .05). The serum levels of endostatin are significantly (P < .01) higher in SSc patients with infected DUs than in SSc patients without infected DUs (139.2 [114.6-340.91] ng/mL vs 117.5 [64.3-163.9] ng/mL). Serum levels of endostatin are higher in patients with DUs, especially in those with infected DUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.