Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29600507›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2018

Probability of Achieving Glycemic Control with Basal Insulin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Practice in the USA.

Lawrence Blonde, Luigi Meneghini, Xuejun Victor Peng, Anders Boss, Kyu Rhee, Alka Shaunik, Supriya Kumar, Sidhartha Balodi, Claire Brulle-Wohlhueter, Rory J McCrimmon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. EndoBridge 2024: pearls and highlights.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Quantifying and Characterizing the Presence of Insulin Overbasalization in a Family Medicine Practice.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lawrence BlondeOchsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA. lawrence.blonde@gmail.com.
Luigi MeneghiniUniversity of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health & Hospital System, Dallas, TX, USA.
Xuejun Victor PengSanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Anders BossSanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Kyu RheeWatson Health, IBM, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alka ShaunikSanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Supriya KumarWatson Health, IBM, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sidhartha BalodiWatson Health, IBM, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Claire Brulle-WohlhueterSanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Rory J McCrimmonUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Sanofi (United States) · USIBM (United States) · USOchsner Medical Center · USParkland Health & Hospital System · USUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBasal insulin (BI) plays an important role in treating type 2 diabetes (T2D), especially when oral antidiabetic (OAD) medications are insufficient for glycemic control. We conducted a retrospective, observational study using electronic medical records (EMR) data from the IBM

methodsA cohort of 6597 patients with T2D who started BI following OAD(s) and had at least one valid glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) result recorded both within 90 days before and 720 days after BI initiation were selected. We estimated the changes from baseline in HbA1c every 6 months, the quarterly conditional probabilities of reaching HbA1c < 7% if a patient had not achieved glycemic control prior to each quarter (Q), and the cumulative probability of reaching glycemic control over 24 months.

resultsOur cohort was representative of patients with T2D who initiated BI from OADs in the USA. The average HbA1c was 9.1% at BI initiation, and decreased robustly (1.5%) in the first 6 months after initiation with no further reductions thereafter. The conditional probability of reaching glycemic control decreased rapidly in the first year (26.6% in Q2; 17.6% in Q3; 8.6% in Q4), and then remained low (≤ 6.1%) for each quarter in the second year. Cumulatively, about 38% of patients reached HbA1c < 7% in the first year; only approximately 8% more did so in the second year.

conclusionOur study of real-world data from a large US EMR database suggested that among patients with T2D who initiated BI after OADs, the likelihood of reaching glycemic control diminished over time, and remained low from 12 months onwards. Additional treatment options should be considered if patients do not reach glycemic control within 12 months of BI initiation.

fundingSanofi Corporation.

Indexed as

Basal insulinIBM Explorys databaseReal-world evidenceType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID29600507
PMCPMC5984916
OpenAlexW2795700244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.