ArticleHealth care management science2020
Correction to: The use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in healthcare with a focus on hospitals.
Article in Health care management science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sustainable Health and Wellbeing in the European Union.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Privatization, Corporatization, and Public-Private Partnership in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Health services insights · 2022Article
- A Novel Hybrid Parametric and Non-Parametric Optimisation Model for Average Technical Efficiency Assessment in Public Hospitals during and Post-COVID-19 Pandemic.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Health system efficiency in OECD countries: dynamic network DEA approach.Health economics review · 2021Article
- Analyzing economies of scale and scope in hospitals by use of case mix planning.Health care management science · 2020Article
- Cross-efficiency evaluation in the presence of flexible measures with an application to healthcare systems.Health care management science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The original version of this article unfortunately contained errors. The first column of Tables 5 and 6 in the Appendix section should contain the year of publication instead of the reference number in brackets. The reference citations were then placed in the second column.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.