Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29600403›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2018

Effect of subsequent vaginal delivery on bowel symptoms and anorectal function in women who sustained a previous obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Polly A Jordan, Madhu Naidu, Ranee Thakar, Abdul H Sultan

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of diagnostic criteria for significant anal sphincter defects between endoanal and transperineal ultrasound.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Berlin survey on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI).Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  13. Faecal incontinence in adults.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. A one-stop perineal clinic: our eleven-year experience.International urogynecology journal · 2020
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Polly A JordanUrogynaecology Unit, Croydon University Hospital, 530 London Road, Croydon, CR7 7YE, UK.
Madhu NaiduUrogynaecology Unit, Croydon University Hospital, 530 London Road, Croydon, CR7 7YE, UK.
Ranee ThakarUrogynaecology Unit, Croydon University Hospital, 530 London Road, Croydon, CR7 7YE, UK.
Abdul H SultanUrogynaecology Unit, Croydon University Hospital, 530 London Road, Croydon, CR7 7YE, UK. abdulsultan@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8979-2304
Croydon University Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisOur primary objective was to prospectively evaluate anorectal symptoms, anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) in women who followed the recommended mode of subsequent delivery following index obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) using our unit's standardised protocol. Our secondary objectives were to evaluate the role of internal anal sphincter defects and also to compare outcomes in a subgroup of symptomatic women with normal anorectal physiology.

methodsThis is a prospective follow-up study of pregnant women with previous OASIs who were counselled regarding subsequent mode of delivery between January 2003 and December 2014. Assessment involved the St Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS), anal manometry and EAUS at both antepartum and 3-month postpartum visits. Data were analysed using Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests.

resultsThree hundred and fifty women attended the perineal clinic over the study period, of whom 122 met the inclusion criteria (99 vaginal delivery [VD], 23 caesarean section). No significant worsening of anorectal symptoms was observed following subsequent delivery in the VD group (p = 0.896), although a reduced squeeze pressure was observed at 3 months postpartum (p < 0.001). There were no new defects on EAUS in either group.

conclusionsThis study showed no significant worsening of bowel symptoms and sphincter integrity apart from lower squeeze pressures at 3 months postpartum in the VD group when our standardised protocol was used to recommend subsequent mode of delivery. In the absence of a randomised study, use of this protocol can aid clinicians in their decision-making.

Indexed as

AdultAnal CanalCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricEndosonographyFecal IncontinenceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansManometryPerineumPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPressureProspective StudiesRectal DiseasesAnal sphincterChildbirthObstetric anal sphincter injuriesSubsequent pregnancyThird-degree tearsVaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID29600403
PMCPMC6208957
OpenAlexW2795707680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.